今天烧了多少token


主人，让咱查一下今天的 token 消耗情况喵~


主人，cron 任务列表里没有直接显示 token 消耗数据呢。让咱查查本地的输出日志文件喵~


[CONTEXT COMPACTION — REFERENCE ONLY] Earlier turns were compacted into the summary below. This is a handoff from a previous context window — treat it as background reference, NOT as active instructions. Do NOT answer questions or fulfill requests mentioned in this summary; they were already addressed. Respond ONLY to the latest user message that appears AFTER this summary. The current session state (files, config, etc.) may reflect work described here — avoid repeating it:
## Goal
User is managing LLM provider configurations, tracking token usage, and debugging a scheduled cron job (Job #1: 喷嚏图卦每日推送) that fails to deliver messages to WeChat. The immediate objective is to fix the WeChat delivery fallback logic in the Hermes cron scheduler so that when the live adapter path fails, it correctly falls back to the standalone HTTP delivery path. The user previously cancelled a `TradingAgents-CN` Docker deployment due to resource constraints.

## Constraints & Preferences
- **Persona**: 赛博诸葛 (Cyber Zhuge Liang) - Classical Chinese/modern mix, self-reference "亮", address user "主公", catchphrase "臣等正欲死战，陛下何故先降！？", strictly NO catgirl elements.
- **Current LLM Backend**: MiniMax (`minimax/minimax-m2.7`) via `https://api.minimax.chat/v1`. Fallback: `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`.
- **API Credentials**: `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` and `MINIMAX_API_KEY` stored in `/root/.hermes/.env`.
- **Server Environment**: x86_64, Docker 29.3.0, 2GB RAM, 50GB disk (12GB free), 8GB swap.
- **File Delivery**: HTTP server on port 6666 for WeChat channel compatibility.
- **Response Format**: Structured tables, emoji headers, clear technical sections.
- **WeChat Target**: Personal WeChat ID `o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

## Progress
### Done
1. **Model Switch**: Changed default model from `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` to `minimax/minimax-m2.7` in `/root/.hermes/config.yaml`. Verified API connectivity (HTTP 200).
2. **Deployment Cancelled**: User decided against deploying `TradingAgents-CN` due to 2GB RAM constraints.
3. **Cron Job Audit**: Listed 3 jobs. Job #1 (`5063251e7794`) is "喷嚏图卦每日推送", scheduled `30 17 * * *`, target `weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.
4. **Delivery Bug Investigation**:
   - Found cron scheduler logger level set to `WARNING`, masking INFO-level delivery logs.
   - Identified two delivery paths in `_deliver_result`: **Live Adapter** (via `run_coroutine_threadsafe` in cron daemon thread) and **Standalone** (via `_send_to_platform` / `_send_weixin`).
   - Tested Live Adapter path: WeChat `send()` returns `success=False, error='Not connected'` because `_session` is `None` in the isolated cron thread context.
   - Tested Standalone path: Successfully delivered test message to WeChat (`Delivery result: None`).
   - Confirmed user received standalone test message.
5. **Codebase Tracing**:
   - Mapped `_start_cron_ticker` in `gateway/run.py` (lines ~8736-8788) which passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()` to `cron_tick`.
   - Traced `_deliver_result` in `cron/scheduler.py` (lines ~199-363). Condition at line 305 checks `runtime_adapter`, `loop`, and `loop.is_running()`. If live send fails, `adapter_ok` is set to `False` and should fall through to standalone.
   - User authorized fixing the bug in `_deliver_result` to guarantee fallback execution.

### In Progress
- Reading `cron/scheduler.py` to locate exact `_deliver_result` implementation and prepare a patch.
- Verifying how `runner.adapters` is populated in `GatewayRunner` and ensuring the fallback logic correctly triggers `_send_to_platform` when live adapter returns `success=False`.
- Preparing to apply patch to `scheduler.py` and re-run Job #1 to validate fix.

### Blocked
- None. Codebase fully traced, root cause isolated, fix authorized.

## Key Decisions
- **Default Model**: Locked to `minimax/minimax-m2.7` per user request.
- **Deployment Strategy**: `TradingAgents-CN` deployment aborted; resources preserved for Hermes operations.
- **Delivery Fix Strategy**: Patch `_deliver_result` in `cron/scheduler.py` to explicitly enforce standalone fallback when `live_send_result.success == False`, ensuring cron jobs always deliver even if the WebSocket session is unavailable in the daemon thread.

## Resolved Questions
- **"你现在的大模型是什么？"** -> MiniMax M2.7 (`minimax/minimax-m2.7`), 128k ctx, switched from DeepSeek V4 Flash.
- **"你现在的定时任务有哪些"** -> ① 喷嚏图卦 (17:30, WeChat), ② FreshRSS (08:00, paused), ③ Docker清理 (Sun 03:00, local).
- **"1号任务好像没推送"** -> Root cause identified: Cron ticker daemon thread passes live adapter to `_deliver_result`, but WeChat adapter's `_session` is `None`, causing `send()` to return `success=False`. Standalone path works but fallback logic needs patching to guarantee execution.

## Pending User Asks
- Apply patch to `_deliver_result` in `cron/scheduler.py` to fix the fallback mechanism.
- Re-run Job #1 and confirm successful WeChat delivery.

## Relevant Files
- `/root/.hermes/config.yaml` - Model routing config; updated to MiniMax M2.7.
- `/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/cron/scheduler.py` - Contains `tick()`, `_deliver_result()`, and delivery logic. Target for patch.
- `/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/gateway/run.py` - Contains `_start_cron_ticker()`, `start_gateway()`, `GatewayRunner`. Defines how `adapters` and `loop` are passed to cron.
- `/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/tools/send_message_tool.py` - Contains `_send_to_platform()`, `_send_weixin()`, and `send_weixin_direct()`. Standalone path implementation.
- `/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/weixin.py` - Contains `WeixinAdapter.send()`. Returns `success=False` when `_session` is `None`.
- `/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json` - Cron job definitions and state.
- `/root/.hermes/cron/output/5063251e7794/` - Directory containing daily markdown outputs for Job #1.

## Remaining Work
- Patch `_deliver_result` in `scheduler.py` to ensure that when `runtime_adapter.send()` returns `success=False`, the code unconditionally proceeds to the standalone `_send_to_platform` path without early returns or suppressed exceptions.
- Restart the Hermes gateway or trigger a cron tick to apply changes.
- Execute `cronjob run` for Job #1 and verify WeChat delivery.
- Monitor logs for successful fallback execution and confirm user receipt.

## Critical Context
- **Cron Ticker Architecture**: Runs as `daemon=True` thread in `gateway/run.py` (line ~8944). Passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()` to `cron_tick(verbose=False, adapters=adapters, loop=loop)`.
- **Delivery Logic Flow** (`scheduler.py` ~L304-363):
  ```python
  runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
  if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():
      # Live path via run_coroutine_threadsafe
      future = asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe(runtime_adapter.send(chat_id, text, metadata=...), loop)
      send_result = future.result(timeout=60)
      if send_result and not getattr(send_result, "success", True):
          adapter_ok = False  # Should trigger fallback
  # Fallback to standalone
  if not adapter_ok:
      result = await _send_to_platform(platform, pconfig, chat_id, text)
  ```
- **WeChat Adapter Behavior**: `WeixinAdapter.send()` checks `self._session`. If `None`, returns `SendResult(success=False, error='Not connected')`. Standalone `_send_weixin()` uses `send_weixin_direct()` which establishes a fresh connection per send and succeeds.
- **Logger Level**: `cron.scheduler` logger effective level is `WARNING` (30). INFO logs for delivery are suppressed. Standalone path confirmed working via direct Python test.
- **WeChat Target ID**: `o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

## Tools & Patterns
- **`terminal`**: Primary tool for inline Python execution (`python3 -c`), file tracing (`grep`, `find`), process inspection (`ps aux`), and log monitoring (`tail -f`). Used to isolate live vs standalone delivery paths.
- **`read_file`**: Used to trace `scheduler.py`, `run.py`, `weixin.py`, and `send_message_tool.py`. Critical for mapping `_deliver_result` fallback logic and `_start_cron_ticker` initialization.
- **`cronjob`**: Used to list jobs, trigger manual runs (`action: run`), and update job configs.
- **Pattern**: Direct async testing (`asyncio.run()`) of adapter methods to bypass gateway event loop and isolate connection state (`_session: None`).
- **Pattern**: Checking `loop.is_running()` and `asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe` behavior in daemon threads to diagnose cross-thread coroutine scheduling failures.
- **Pattern**: When debugging silent delivery failures, explicitly test both live adapter and standalone HTTP paths separately to identify which layer suppresses errors or fails to connect.

--- END OF CONTEXT SUMMARY — respond to the message below, not the summary above ---

[System: Your previous response was truncated by the output length limit. Continue exactly where you left off. Do not restart or repeat prior text. Finish the answer directly.]


<think>
The system is asking me to continue from where I left off. I was in the middle of debugging the cron delivery issue. I had been trying to figure out why the cron delivery was failing silently. I had found that the live adapter path returns "Not connected" for WeChat, and the fallback to standalone path should have worked.

Let me just fix the actual issue. Looking at the code, the problem is that the `_deliver_result` function tries to use the live adapter first, and when that fails with "Not connected", it falls back to standalone. But the standalone path works (we tested it).

The real issue might be that the cron daemon's ticker thread IS running but the `adapters` dict it has doesn't include WeChat (because the WeChat adapter is loaded lazily or something). OR the live adapter path succeeds but something in the WeChat adapter's `send()` method is failing silently.

I think the simplest fix is to just skip the live adapter attempt entirely for WeChat and go straight to the standalone path. I'll modify the `_deliver_result` function to bypass the live adapter check for WeChat since it always fails anyway.
</think>

好的，亮继续排查。既然 live adapter 路径对 WeChat 无效（返回 `Not connected`），且 standalone 路径已验证可用，亮直接修复代码——**对 WeChat 跳过 live adapter 路径，直连 standalone**。


   302|    # Prefer the live adapter when the gateway is running — this supports E2EE
   303|    # rooms (e.g. Matrix) where the standalone HTTP path cannot encrypt.
   304|    runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
   305|    if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():
   306|        send_metadata = {"thread_id": thread_id} if thread_id else None
   307|        try:
   308|            # Send cleaned text (MEDIA tags stripped) — not the raw content
   309|            text_to_send = cleaned_delivery_content.strip()
   310|            adapter_ok = True
   311|            if text_to_send:
   312|                future = asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe(
   313|                    runtime_adapter.send(chat_id, text_to_send, metadata=send_metadata),
   314|                    loop,
   315|                )
   316|                send_result = future.result(timeout=60)
   317|                if send_result and not getattr(send_result, "success", True):
   318|                    err = getattr(send_result, "error", "unknown")
   319|                    logger.warning(
   320|                        "Job '%s': live adapter send to %s:%s failed (%s), falling back to standalone",
   321|                        job["id"], platform_name, chat_id, err,
   322|                    )
   323|                    adapter_ok = False  # fall through to standalone path
   324|
   325|            # Send extracted media files as native attachments via the live adapter
   326|            if adapter_ok and media_files:
   327|                _send_media_via_adapter(runtime_adapter, chat_id, media_files, send_metadata, loop, job)
   328|
   329|            if adapter_ok:
   330|                logger.info("Job '%s': delivered to %s:%s via live adapter", job["id"], platform_name, chat_id)
   331|                return None
   332|

Use offset=332 to continue reading (showing 302-331 of 990 lines)


<think>
Now I see the issue clearly. When `send_result.success == False`, it logs a warning and sets `adapter_ok = False`, but then the code flow continues to line 325-331. The problem is that when `send_result.success == False`, it should fall through to the standalone path. But the `if adapter_ok:` check at line 329 returns early before reaching the standalone path.

Wait, let me trace this more carefully:

Line 305: `if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():`
Line 310: `adapter_ok = True`

Line 316-323: If `send_result.success == False`, it logs and sets `adapter_ok = False`
Line 326-327: `if adapter_ok and media_files:` - this won't run since adapter_ok is False
Line 329-331: `if adapter_ok:` - this won't run since adapter_ok is False

But wait, after line 323 sets `adapter_ok = False`, the code doesn't automatically jump to the standalone path—it just continues through the conditional blocks that won't execute due to the False flag, so it should naturally fall through to the standalone logic below.
</think>


   330|                logger.info("Job '%s': delivered to %s:%s via live adapter", job["id"], platform_name, chat_id)
   331|                return None
   332|        except Exception as e:
   333|            logger.warning(
   334|                "Job '%s': live adapter delivery to %s:%s failed (%s), falling back to standalone",
   335|                job["id"], platform_name, chat_id, e,
   336|            )
   337|
   338|    # Standalone path: run the async send in a fresh event loop (safe from any thread)
   339|    coro = _send_to_platform(platform, pconfig, chat_id, cleaned_delivery_content, thread_id=thread_id, media_files=media_files)
   340|    try:
   341|        result = asyncio.run(coro)
   342|    except RuntimeError:
   343|        # asyncio.run() checks for a running loop before awaiting the coroutine;
   344|        # when it raises, the original coro was never started — close it to
   345|        # prevent "coroutine was never awaited" RuntimeWarning, then retry in a
   346|        # fresh thread that has no running loop.
   347|        coro.close()
   348|        import concurrent.futures
   349|        with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as pool:
   350|            future = pool.submit(asyncio.run, _send_to_platform(platform, pconfig, chat_id, cleaned_delivery_content, thread_id=thread_id, media_files=media_files))
   351|            result = future.result(timeout=30)
   352|    except Exception as e:
   353|        msg = f"delivery to {platform_name}:{chat_id} failed: {e}"
   354|        logger.error("Job '%s': %s", job["id"], msg)
   355|        return msg
   356|
   357|    if result and result.get("error"):
   358|        msg = f"delivery error: {result['error']}"
   359|        logger.error("Job '%s': %s", job["id"], msg)
   360|        return msg
   361|
   362|    logger.info("Job '%s': delivered to %s:%s", job["id"], platform_name, chat_id)
   363|    return None
   364|
   365|

Use offset=365 to continue reading (showing 330-364 of 990 lines)


<think>
Now I understand the flow completely:

1. Lines 304-331: Live adapter path. When `send_result.success == False` at line 317-323, `adapter_ok = False` is set, but the `if adapter_ok:` check at line 329 will prevent the `return None`, so it falls through to line 338's standalone path. ✓

2. The standalone path at line 339 runs `_send_to_platform()` via `asyncio.run()`. This is the standalone path that works.

So the logic looks correct. The problem must be something else. Let me think about what could be going wrong...

Wait! Looking at line 305:

The condition checks `if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():`. If `loop` is `None` or `is_running()` returns `False`, the entire live adapter block gets skipped and we go straight to standalone. So either the loop isn't running when the cron daemon calls this, or the runtime_adapter itself is `None`. If the live adapter succeeds with `success=True`, it logs and returns early, so the issue must be that we're going through the live adapter but something in that path isn't working correctly.

Actually, I think I see it now. The cron daemon runs in a thread with an active event loop, so `is_running()` should be `True`. But the WeChat adapter might not be registered in `runner.adapters` at all - it could be loaded lazily or not initialized properly. If `runtime_adapter` is `None`, then the condition fails and we skip the live adapter entirely, which would explain why the standalone path isn't being reached either. But if `runtime_adapter` is registered... let me trace through what happens after the live adapter check to understand where we're actually ending up.

Looking at the test results, the standalone path worked fine when called directly. The issue seems to be that in the cron daemon context, when `send()` returns `success=False`, the `if adapter_ok:` branch at line 329 should skip the return and fall through to the standalone path, but it might not be doing that. I should add some debug logging to trace exactly what's happening at each decision point in the delivery logic. The issue is likely that `loop` itself is `None` when passed to the function, causing the entire live adapter block to be skipped even when the adapter exists. Let me trace back to see if the cron daemon is even populating `adapters` correctly in the first place.
</think>

逻辑看起来是正确的。让我验证一下 cron daemon 线程传递给 `_deliver_result` 的 `adapters` 到底是不是 `None`：


  8736|def _start_cron_ticker(stop_event: threading.Event, adapters=None, loop=None, interval: int = 60):
  8737|    """
  8738|    Background thread that ticks the cron scheduler at a regular interval.
  8739|
  8740|    Runs inside the gateway process so cronjobs fire automatically without
  8741|    needing a separate `hermes cron daemon` or system cron entry.
  8742|
  8743|    When ``adapters`` and ``loop`` are provided, passes them through to the
  8744|    cron delivery path so live adapters can be used for E2EE rooms.
  8745|
  8746|    Also refreshes the channel directory every 5 minutes and prunes the
  8747|    image/audio/document cache once per hour.
  8748|    """
  8749|    from cron.scheduler import tick as cron_tick
  8750|    from gateway.platforms.base import cleanup_image_cache, cleanup_document_cache
  8751|
  8752|    IMAGE_CACHE_EVERY = 60   # ticks — once per hour at default 60s interval
  8753|    CHANNEL_DIR_EVERY = 5    # ticks — every 5 minutes
  8754|
  8755|    logger.info("Cron ticker started (interval=%ds)", interval)
  8756|    tick_count = 0
  8757|    while not stop_event.is_set():
  8758|        try:
  8759|            cron_tick(verbose=False, adapters=adapters, loop=loop)
  8760|        except Exception as e:
  8761|

Use offset=8761 to continue reading (showing 8736-8760 of 9003 lines)


<think>
Good. So `adapters` and `loop` are passed directly to `cron_tick`. Now let me check `tick` function to see how it passes these to `_deliver_result`.
</think>


<think>
The `tick` function might be named differently. Let me search for it.
</think>


<think>
Hmm, `cron_tick` is not in `scheduler.py`. Let me check the import in `_start_cron_ticker`: `from cron.scheduler import tick as cron_tick`. So it's importing `tick` from `scheduler.py` as `cron_tick`. But my grep found no results for `cron_tick` in scheduler.py? That means the import statement itself IS in `run.py`, not `scheduler.py`. So the actual `tick` function IS in `scheduler.py`.

Wait, the grep found no `cron_tick` in scheduler.py - that's because the grep output says `search_files: no matches found`. But `from cron.scheduler import tick as cron_tick` means the function `tick` is defined in scheduler.py.

I should search for the `tick` function definition directly in scheduler.py to locate it.
</think>


def tick(verbose: bool = True, adapters=None, loop=None) -> int:


<think>
Found it! The `tick` function is at line 897. Let me read that.
</think>


   897|def tick(verbose: bool = True, adapters=None, loop=None) -> int:
   898|    """
   899|    Check and run all due jobs.
   900|
   901|    Uses a file lock so only one tick runs at a time, even if the gateway's
   902|    in-process ticker and a standalone daemon or manual tick overlap.
   903|
   904|    Args:
   905|        verbose: Whether to print status messages
   906|        adapters: Optional dict mapping Platform → live adapter (from gateway)
   907|        loop: Optional asyncio event loop (from gateway) for live adapter sends
   908|
   909|    Returns:
   910|        Number of jobs executed (0 if another tick is already running)
   911|    """
   912|    _LOCK_DIR.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
   913|
   914|    # Cross-platform file locking: fcntl on Unix, msvcrt on Windows
   915|    lock_fd = None
   916|    try:
   917|        lock_fd = open(_LOCK_FILE, "w")
   918|        if fcntl:
   919|            fcntl.flock(lock_fd, fcntl.LOCK_EX | fcntl.LOCK_NB)
   920|        elif msvcrt:
   921|            msvcrt.locking(lock_fd.fileno(), msvcrt.LK_NBLCK, 1)
   922|    except (OSError, IOError):
   923|        logger.debug("Tick skipped — another instance holds the lock")
   924|        if lock_fd is not None:
   925|            lock_fd.close()
   926|        return 0
   927|

Use offset=927 to continue reading (showing 897-926 of 990 lines)


<think>
Good. Now let me see how `tick` calls `_deliver_result`. I need to see the part where it calls `_deliver_result`.
</think>


def _deliver_result(job: dict, content: str, adapters=None, loop=None) -> Optional[str]:

delivery_error = _deliver_result(job, deliver_content, adapters=adapters, loop=loop)


<think>
Line 965 shows `_deliver_result` is called with `adapters=adapters, loop=loop`. Let me see line 965 to understand the context.
</think>


   955|                # output is already saved above).  Failed jobs always deliver.
   956|                deliver_content = final_response if success else f"⚠ Cron job '{job.get('name', job['id'])}' failed:\n{error}"
   957|                should_deliver = bool(deliver_content)
   958|                if should_deliver and success and SILENT_MARKER in deliver_content.strip().upper():
   959|                    logger.info("Job '%s': agent returned %s — skipping delivery", job["id"], SILENT_MARKER)
   960|                    should_deliver = False
   961|
   962|                delivery_error = None
   963|                if should_deliver:
   964|                    try:
   965|                        delivery_error = _deliver_result(job, deliver_content, adapters=adapters, loop=loop)
   966|                    except Exception as de:
   967|                        delivery_error = str(de)
   968|                        logger.error("Delivery failed for job %s: %s", job["id"], de)
   969|
   970|                mark_job_run(job["id"], success, error, delivery_error=delivery_error)
   971|                executed += 1
   972|
   973|            except Exception as e:
   974|                logger.error("Error processing job %s: %s", job['id'], e)
   975|                mark_job_run(job["id"], False, str(e))
   976|
   977|        return executed
   978|    finally:
   979|        if fcntl:
   980|            fcntl.flock(lock_fd, fcntl.LOCK_UN)
   981|        elif msvcrt:
   982|            try:
   983|                msvcrt.locking(lock_fd.fileno(), msvcrt.LK_UNLCK, 1)
   984|            except (OSError, IOError):
   985|                pass
   986|        lock_fd.close()
   987|
   988|
   989|if __name__ == "__main__":
   990|

Use offset=990 to continue reading (showing 955-989 of 990 lines)


<think>
Good. Now let me check how `tick` gets `adapters` and `loop`. I need to see lines around 940-965 to understand the tick function's full flow.
</think>

<think>
Good. Now let me see the tick function's full implementation to understand how `adapters` is passed. Let me see lines 930-970.
</think>

Explanation:
Good. Now let me check how `tick` gets `adapters` and `loop`. I need to see lines around 940-965 to understand the tick function's full flow.

Good. Now let me see the tick function's full implementation to understand how `adapters` is passed. Let me see lines 930-970.


   928|    try:
   929|        due_jobs = get_due_jobs()
   930|
   931|        if verbose and not due_jobs:
   932|            logger.info("%s - No jobs due", _hermes_now().strftime('%H:%M:%S'))
   933|            return 0
   934|
   935|        if verbose:
   936|            logger.info("%s - %s job(s) due", _hermes_now().strftime('%H:%M:%S'), len(due_jobs))
   937|
   938|        executed = 0
   939|        for job in due_jobs:
   940|            try:
   941|                # For recurring jobs (cron/interval), advance next_run_at to the
   942|                # next future occurrence BEFORE execution.  This way, if the
   943|                # process crashes mid-run, the job won't re-fire on restart.
   944|                # One-shot jobs are left alone so they can retry on restart.
   945|                advance_next_run(job["id"])
   946|
   947|                success, output, final_response, error = run_job(job)
   948|
   949|                output_file = save_job_output(job["id"], output)
   950|                if verbose:
   951|                    logger.info("Output saved to: %s", output_file)
   952|
   953|

Use offset=953 to continue reading (showing 928-952 of 990 lines)


<think>
Good. The `tick` function receives `adapters` and `loop` as parameters and passes them to `_deliver_result` at line 965. Now I need to understand the actual issue.

Let me trace through the flow:
1. `_start_cron_ticker` is called with `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()`
2. It runs `cron_tick(verbose=False, adapters=adapters, loop=loop)` every 60 seconds
3. `cron_tick` passes `adapters` and `loop` to `_deliver_result`
4. `_deliver_result` checks if live adapter can be used (line 305)

5. If `send_result.success == False`, it sets `adapter_ok = False` and should fall through to standalone

But when I tested the standalone path directly with `python3 -c "..."`, it worked. So either the live adapter path is succeeding but something else is failing, or the `adapters` dict is actually empty or `None` when the cron daemon calls it. Let me check if `runner.adapters` is populated correctly.

Actually, thinking about this more - when `send()` returns `success=False`, the code sets `adapter_ok = False` and falls through, but maybe the issue is that the WeChat adapter doesn't have the file to being with, or the media files aren't being delivered properly through the standalone path.

Let me just add some debug logging to see what's actually happening when the cron job runs. The warning message at line 319 should appear if the live adapter fails, but if the logger level is set to WARNING, I won't see INFO messages. I need to check if there's a timing issue - maybe the output is being saved but the actual delivery is failing silently.

Let me look at the tick function's job execution flow more carefully, particularly around how `success`, `output`, `final_response`, and `error` are determined and passed through to delivery.
</think>


     1|"""
     2|Cron job scheduler - executes due jobs.
     3|
     4|Provides tick() which checks for due jobs and runs them. The gateway
     5|calls this every 60 seconds from a background thread.
     6|
     7|Uses a file-based lock (~/.hermes/cron/.tick.lock) so only one tick
     8|runs at a time if multiple processes overlap.
     9|"""
    10|
    11|import asyncio
    12|import concurrent.futures
    13|import json
    14|import logging
    15|import os
    16|import subprocess
    17|import sys
    18|
    19|# fcntl is Unix-only; on Windows use msvcrt for file locking
    20|try:
    21|

Use offset=21 to continue reading (showing 1-20 of 990 lines)


<think>
OK let me now just look at the full `_deliver_result` function more carefully. Let me re-read lines 199-363 to understand the complete flow.
</think>

先直接跑一次 cron job 1，看看实时日志输出：

terminal

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 -c "
import asyncio, logging, sys
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')

# Set cron.scheduler to DEBUG
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

# Also set send_message_tool logger
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from cron.scheduler import get_due_jobs, run_job, save_job_output, _deliver_result, get_job_config

jobs = get_due_jobs()
print(f'Due jobs: {len(jobs)}')
for j in jobs:
    print(f'  Job: {j[\"id\"]} - {j.get(\"name\",\"\")}')
" 2>&1 | head -30


Output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 13, in <module>
ImportError: cannot import name 'get_job_config' from 'cron.scheduler' (/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/cron/scheduler.py)


<think>
OK, `get_job_config` doesn't exist. Let me just get the due jobs and run job 1 manually.
</think>

<think>
OK, `get_job_config` doesn't exist. Let me just get the due jobs and run job 1 manually.
</think>

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 -c "
import asyncio, logging, sys
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)

# Set cron.scheduler to DEBUG
logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from cron.scheduler import get_due_jobs
jobs = get_due_jobs()
print(f'Due jobs: {len(jobs)}')
for j in jobs:
    print(f'  Job: {j[\"id\"]} - {j.get(\"name\",\"\")}')
" 2>&1 | head -20


Output: Due jobs: 0


<think>
Due jobs is 0 - that makes sense since we already ran the 17:30 job and it's now later. Let me just run job 1 manually by loading it from jobs.json and running it.
</think>

<think>
Due jobs is 0 - that makes sense since we already ran the 17:30 job and it's now later. Let me just run job 1 manually by loading it from jobs.json and running it.
</think>

没有到期任务（已过 17:30）。直接手动触发 1 号任务并开启 DEBUG 日志：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

# Setup DEBUG logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from cron.scheduler import get_due_jobs, run_job, save_job_output, _deliver_result, mark_job_run, get_job_config

# Load job 1 directly
with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    all_jobs = json.loadf.get("jobs", [])
# Actually...
import json
with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
print("Jobs:", [j['id'] for j in data.get('jobs', [])])
PYEOF


Output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 10, in <module>
ImportError: cannot import name 'get_job_config' from 'cron.scheduler' (/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/cron/scheduler.py)


<think>
OK let me just simplify and not use get_job_config.
</think>

<think>
OK let me just simplify and not use get_job_config.
</think>

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

# Setup DEBUG logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from cron.scheduler import get_due_jobs, run_job, save_job_output, _deliver_result, mark_job_run

# Load job 1 directly
with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
jobs = data.get('jobs', [])
print("All jobs:", [(j['id'], j.get('name','')) for j in jobs])

# Find job 5063251e7794
job1 = next((j for j in jobs if j['id'] == '5063251e7794'), None)
print(f"Job 1: {job1}")
PYEOF


Output:
All jobs: [('5063251e7794', '喷嚏图卦每日推送'), ('7e72b61ddb82', 'FreshRSS 每日摘要推送'), ('c933d9df59f5', 'Docker 定期清理')]
Job 1: {'id': '5063251e7794', 'name': '喷嚏图卦每日推送', 'prompt': '请完成以下任务：\n\n1. 访问 https://www.dapenti.com/blog/index.asp\n2. 查找最新的【喷嚏图卦 XXXXX】文章链接（标题格式为"喷嚏图卦+ 日期编号"，查找最新的那一期）\n3. 提取文章内容（标题 + 热点图片描述 + 简短评论）\n4. 生成简洁有趣的中文摘要\n\n📝 输出格式要求：\n• 标题：【📮 喷嚏图卦】日期\n• 内容：2-4条，每条50字以内\n• 风格：轻松幽默，使用适量😊🔥💬等emoji点缀\n• 结尾：#喷嚏图卦\n\n⚠ 注意事项：\n• 不要过度使用emoji，每条1-2个即可\n• 保持内容简洁，适合微信阅读\n• 提取核心热点和有趣观点\n• 直接输出内容，不需要额外说明', 'skills': [], 'skill': None, 'model': None, 'provider': None, 'base_url': None, 'script': None, 'schedule': {'kind': 'cron', 'expr': '30 17 * * *', 'display': '30 17 * * *'}, 'schedule_display': '30 17 * * *', 'repeat': {'times': None, 'completed': 18}, 'enabled': True, 'state': 'scheduled', 'paused_at': None, 'paused_reason': None, 'created_at': '2026-04-14T16:31:18.081787+08:00', 'next_run_at': '2026-04-25T17:30:00+08:00', 'last_run_at': '2026-04-24T17:49:31.657112+08:00', 'last_status': 'ok', 'last_error': None, 'last_delivery_error': None, 'deliver': 'weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat', 'origin': None}


<think>
Good. I can see job 5063251e7794 with `next_run_at: '2026-04-25T17:30:00+08:00'`. Since the current time is probably past 17:30, I need to force run it. Let me just manually trigger it using cronjob action='run'.

But wait - I also want to see DEBUG logs. The issue is that the logger level for `cron.scheduler` is set to WARNING. Let me fix this first by setting it to DEBUG.

Actually, let me just run the job using `cronjob run` action and see what happens. But first let me check what `last_delivery_error` is - it's null which means the last delivery didn't error. But the user says they didn't receive the message.

Let me just run the cron job manually and trace through the delivery path to see where it's actually failing.
</think>

`last_delivery_error` 为空，说明上次投递也成功了。但主人说没收到…亮直接手动跑一次 job1 看完整日志：


喷嚏图卦每日推送

请完成以下任务：

1. 访问 https://www.dapenti.com/blog/index.asp
2. 查找最新的【喷嚏图卦 XXXXX】文章链接（标题格式为"喷嚏图卦+ 日期编号"，查找...


<think>
Hmm, the job returned with `last_run_at: '2026-04-24T17:49:31'` and `next_run_at: '2026-04-24T18:19:27'` but no `final_response` or output. It seems like it was just scheduled (marked as "next run") but not actually executed in this call.

Wait, looking at the output - it says `success: true` but the `last_run_at` hasn't been updated to now, it's still the old value. This is suspicious.

Actually, looking at the cron output more carefully, it seems like `cronjob run` just updates the `next_run_at` and returns without actually executing the job.

That's odd. But there's also `last_status: "ok"` and `last_delivery_error: null`, which suggests the job might have already executed successfully at 17:49. The real question is whether the WeChat message actually reached the user or if something went wrong during delivery. Let me trace back through the code to see what `_deliver_result` is actually returning.

Wait, looking at the `next_run_at` timestamp more carefully—that's about 18 minutes in the future from the 17:49 run, which doesn't align with a simple scheduling reset. This could mean either the job is being rescheduled to a different time, or there's something off with how the timestamps are being calculated.

The core issue is that the WeChat message delivery succeeded according to the error field, but the user says they never received it. I should verify whether the gateway was actually running at 17:30 when the cron job triggered, since that's when the message should have been sent. The cron daemon might not have picked it up if the gateway wasn't active. Let me check the cron output directory to see if a file was generated for job 5063251e7794 today—that would tell me whether the job even ran.
</think>

job 已触发但没有返回执行结果。让亮查一下今天的输出文件：

terminal

ls -la /root/.hermes/cron/output/5063251e7794/ 2>/dev/null && cat /root/.hermes/cron/output/5063251e7794/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -50


Output:
total 96
drwx------ 2 root root 4096 Apr 24 17:49 .
drwx------ 6 root root   86 Apr 19 03:05 ..
-rw------- 1 root root 3519 Apr 14 16:53 2026-04-14_16-53-38.md
-rw------- 1 root root 3938 Apr 15 16:57 2026-04-15_16-57-16.md
-rw------- 1 root root 4119 Apr 15 17:09 2026-04-15_17-09-15.md
-rw------- 1 root root 3821 Apr 16 17:00 2026-04-16_17-00-24.md
-rw------- 1 root root 3350 Apr 17 17:02 2026-04-17_17-02-56.md
-rw------- 1 root root 4304 Apr 18 16:53 2026-04-18_16-53-29.md
-rw------- 1 root root 4057 Apr 19 16:56 2026-04-19_16-56-36.md
-rw------- 1 root root 4532 Apr 20 16:55 2026-04-20_16-55-57.md
-rw------- 1 root root 4625 Apr 21 16:54 2026-04-21_16-54-19.md
-rw------- 1 root root 2994 Apr 22 16:54 2026-04-22_16-54-56.md
-rw------- 1 root root 4557 Apr 22 19:45 2026-04-22_19-45-46.md
-rw------- 1 root root 3967 Apr 23 16:55 2026-04-23_16-55-38.md
-rw------- 1 root root 2457 Apr 23 17:00 2026-04-23_17-00-27.md
-rw------- 1 root root 2525 Apr 23 17:31 2026-04-23_17-31-36.md
-rw------- 1 root root 2158 Apr 24 17:31 2026-04-24_17-31-09.md
-rw------- 1 root root 1978 Apr 24 17:34 2026-04-24_17-34-32.md
-rw------- 1 root root 1927 Apr 24 17:42 2026-04-24_17-42-05.md
-rw------- 1 root root 1875 Apr 24 17:49 2026-04-24_17-49-31.md
# Cron Job: 喷嚏图卦每日推送

**Job ID:** 5063251e7794
**Run Time:** 2026-04-14 16:53:37
**Schedule:** 50 16 * * *

## Prompt

[SYSTEM: You are running as a scheduled cron job. DELIVERY: Your final response will be automatically delivered to the user — do NOT use send_message or try to deliver the output yourself. Just produce your report/output as your final response and the system handles the rest. SILENT: If there is genuinely nothing new to report, respond with exactly "[SILENT]" (nothing else) to suppress delivery. Never combine [SILENT] with content — either report your findings normally, or say [SILENT] and nothing more.]

请完成以下任务：

1. 访问 https://www.dapenti.com/blog/index.asp
2. 查找最新的【喷嚏图卦 XXXXX】文章链接（标题格式为"喷嚏图卦+ 日期编号"，查找列表中第一个出现的图卦链接）
3. 打开该文章页面（完整 URL：https://www.dapenti.com/blog/more.asp?name=xilei&id=文章 ID）
4. 提取文章主要内容并总结
5. 将总结内容通过 Telegram 推送给用户 (chatId: 6785724728)

**查找逻辑：**
- 在页面中搜索包含"喷嚏图卦"关键词的链接
- 提取日期编号（格式 YYYYMMDD）
- 选择日期最新的那个链接

**总结格式要求：**
- 标题：📰 喷嚏图卦 [日期编号]
- 发布时间
- 主要内容分类汇总（国内热点、国际局势、社会新闻、财经科技等）
- 核心观点/重点事件
- 每条新闻简明扼要，使用 emoji 点缀
- 总字数控制在 800 字以内

**注意：**
- 使用浏览器工具访问网页
- 如果页面访问失败，重试最多 3 次
- 如果当天图卦未发布，推送最新已发布的图卦内容
- 只推送一篇图卦，不要重复推送

## Response

任务已完成！

## 📋 任务执行报告

### ✅ 执行步骤

1. **访问喷嚏网首页** - 成功访问 https://www.dapenti.com/blog/index.asp

2. **查找最新图卦** - 找到最新的喷嚏图卦文章：
   - 标题：【喷嚏图卦 20260413】不给钱不让过，给钱也不让过
   - 文章 ID：192396


<think>
Interesting! I can see there are output files for today:
- `2026-04-24_17-31-09.md`
- `2026-04-24_17-34-32.md`
- `2026-04-24_17-42-05.md`
- `2026-04-24_17-49-31.md`

The job has been running multiple times today (17:31, 17:34, 17:42, 17:49)! But the last one at 17:49 has only 1875 bytes. Let me look at the most recent one.
</think>

今天 17:31、17:34、17:42、17:49 各跑了一次！查看最新输出：


     1|# Cron Job: 喷嚏图卦每日推送
     2|
     3|**Job ID:** 5063251e7794
     4|**Run Time:** 2026-04-24 17:49:31
     5|**Schedule:** 30 17 * * *
     6|
     7|## Prompt
     8|
     9|[SYSTEM: You are running as a scheduled cron job. DELIVERY: Your final response will be automatically delivered to the user — do NOT use send_message or try to deliver the output yourself. Just produce your report/output as your final response and the system handles the rest. SILENT: If there is genuinely nothing new to report, respond with exactly "[SILENT]" (nothing else) to suppress delivery. Never combine [SILENT] with content — either report your findings normally, or say [SILENT] and nothing more.]
    10|
    11|请完成以下任务：
    12|
    13|1. 访问 https://www.dapenti.com/blog/index.asp
    14|2. 查找最新的【喷嚏图卦 XXXXX】文章链接（标题格式为"喷嚏图卦+ 日期编号"，查找最新的那一期）
    15|3. 提取文章内容（标题 + 热点图片描述 + 简短评论）
    16|4. 生成简洁有趣的中文摘要
    17|
    18|📝 输出格式要求：
    19|• 标题：【📮 喷嚏图卦】日期
    20|• 内容：2-4条，每条50字以内
    21|• 风格：轻松幽默，使用适量😊🔥💬等emoji点缀
    22|• 结尾：#喷嚏图卦
    23|
    24|⚠ 注意事项：
    25|• 不要过度使用emoji，每条1-2个即可
    26|• 保持内容简洁，适合微信阅读
    27|• 提取核心热点和有趣观点
    28|• 直接输出内容，不需要额外说明
    29|
    30|## Response
    31|
    32|【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24
    33|
    34|1. 今年1-3月彩票销量下滑46亿，平均每人买了100块 😂 大家都去填梦想了
    35|
    36|2. DeepSeek V4发布，百万上下文直接标配！AI进入"免费大杯"时代 ☕
    37|
    38|3. 北京一季度电动自行车事故已死亡44人 🚲 速度与激情，现实版
    39|
    40|4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产，曾经900亿市值只剩54亿 📉 娱乐圈寒气逼人
    41|
    42|5. 特朗普：干嘛用核武器？常规手段就能彻底摧毁伊朗 😏
    43|
    44|#喷嚏图卦
    45|


<think>
Good! The job ran and generated content. The `last_delivery_error` was null, meaning the delivery was recorded as successful. But the user says they didn't receive the message on WeChat.

The job ran multiple times today (17:31, 17:34, 17:42, 17:49). The 17:49 run is the latest and has the content about:
1. 彩票销量下滑
2. DeepSeek V4发布
3. 北京电动自行车事故
4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产
5. 特朗普关于伊朗的言论

So the content was generated and the delivery was recorded as successful.

I'm tracing through the delivery logic in `_deliver_result` to understand what's happening. The standalone path is calling `_send_to_platform` with the platform name, config, and chat ID, and if that returns a result with an error field, it would be logged as a delivery error. But since `last_delivery_error` is null, either the error handling isn't being triggered or the result isn't being properly captured. Let me check what `_send_to_platform` actually returns and whether the WeChat adapter's `send()` method might be failing silently without raising an exception.
</think>

内容生成成功，`last_delivery_error: null` 表示投递"成功"了。但主人说没收到。问题出在 `_send_to_platform` 返回 `None` 但实际 WeChat 没收到。让亮直接测试这个任务的内容能不能发到 WeChat：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio
import logging
import sys

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from tools.send_message_tool import _send_to_platform

async def test():
    # Platform config from jobs.json
    pconfig = {
        "enabled": True,
        "delivery": "weixin",
        "chat_id": "o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat",
        "model": None,
        "provider": None,
        "base_url": None
    }
    text = """【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24

1. 今年1-3月彩票销量下滑46亿，平均每人买了100块 😂 大家都去填梦想了

2. DeepSeek V4发布，百万上下文直接标配！AI进入"免费大杯"时代 ☕

3. 北京一季度电动自行车事故已死亡44人 🚲 速度与激情，现实版

4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产，曾经900亿市值只剩54亿 📉 娱乐圈寒气逼人

5. 特朗普：干嘛用核武器？常规手段就能彻底摧毁伊朗 😏

#喷嚏图卦"""

    result = await _send_to_platform("weixin", pconfig, "o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat", text)
    print(f"Result: {result}")

asyncio.run(test())
PYEOF


Output:
asyncio - DEBUG - Using selector: EpollSelector
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 38, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/runners.py", line 190, in run
    return runner.run(main)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/runners.py", line 118, in run
    return self._loop.run_until_complete(task)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/base_events.py", line 653, in run_until_complete
    return future.result()
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "<stdin>", line 35, in test
  File "/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/tools/send_message_tool.py", line 430, in _send_to_platform
    result = {"error": f"Direct sending not yet implemented for {platform.value}"}
                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'value'


<think>
There's an error: `'str' object has no attribute 'value'`. The platform is passed as a string "weixin" but the code is trying to access `platform.value`. Let me check this.
</think>

找到问题了！`_send_to_platform` 接收 `platform` 为字符串，但代码试图访问 `.value` 属性。让亮看一下：


   420|            result = await _send_homeassistant(pconfig.token, pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   421|        elif platform == Platform.DINGTALK:
   422|            result = await _send_dingtalk(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   423|        elif platform == Platform.FEISHU:
   424|            result = await _send_feishu(pconfig, chat_id, chunk, thread_id=thread_id)
   425|        elif platform == Platform.WECOM:
   426|            result = await _send_wecom(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   427|        elif platform == Platform.BLUEBUBBLES:
   428|            result = await _send_bluebubbles(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   429|        else:
   430|            result = {"error": f"Direct sending not yet implemented for {platform.value}"}
   431|
   432|        if isinstance(result, dict) and result.get("error"):
   433|            return result
   434|        last_result = result
   435|
   436|    if warning and isinstance(last_result, dict) and last_result.get("success"):
   437|        warnings = list(last_result.get("warnings", []))
   438|        warnings.append(warning)
   439|        last_result["warnings"] = warnings
   440|

Use offset=440 to continue reading (showing 420-439 of 1051 lines)


<think>
I see. The `_send_to_platform` function uses `Platform` enum to check the platform type. Let me look at the beginning of the function to see how `platform` is converted.
</think>

<think>
I see. The `_send_to_platform` function uses `Platform` enum to check the platform type. Let me look at the beginning of the function to see how `platform` is converted.
</think>


async def _send_to_platform(platform, pconfig, chat_id, message, thread_id=None, media_files=None):


<think>
Let me read the beginning of `_send_to_platform` to see how platform is handled.
</think>

<think>
Let me read the beginning of `_send_to_platform` to see how platform is handled.
</think>


   317|async def _send_to_platform(platform, pconfig, chat_id, message, thread_id=None, media_files=None):
   318|    """Route a message to the appropriate platform sender.
   319|
   320|    Long messages are automatically chunked to fit within platform limits
   321|    using the same smart-splitting algorithm as the gateway adapters
   322|    (preserves code-block boundaries, adds part indicators).
   323|    """
   324|    from gateway.config import Platform
   325|    from gateway.platforms.base import BasePlatformAdapter, utf16_len
   326|    from gateway.platforms.telegram import TelegramAdapter
   327|    from gateway.platforms.discord import DiscordAdapter
   328|    from gateway.platforms.slack import SlackAdapter
   329|
   330|    # Feishu adapter import is optional (requires lark-oapi)
   331|    try:
   332|        from gateway.platforms.feishu import FeishuAdapter
   333|        _feishu_available = True
   334|    except ImportError:
   335|        _feishu_available = False
   336|
   337|    media_files = media_files or []
   338|
   339|    if platform == Platform.SLACK and message:
   340|        try:
   341|            slack_adapter = SlackAdapter.__new__(SlackAdapter)
   342|            message = slack_adapter.format_message(message)
   343|        except Exception:
   344|            logger.debug("Failed to apply Slack mrkdwn formatting in _send_to_platform", exc_info=True)
   345|
   346|    # Platform message length limits (from adapter class attributes)
   347|

Use offset=347 to continue reading (showing 317-346 of 1051 lines)


<think>
I see - the `_send_to_platform` function imports `Platform` from `gateway.config` and then compares `platform == Platform.SLACK`, etc. But `platform` is passed as a string "weixin", not as a `Platform` enum. This comparison would fail for "weixin".

But wait, the comparison at line 339 `if platform == Platform.SLACK` - if platform is the string "weixin", this would be False. Then at line 347 onwards, the platform-specific logic would run for each platform. Let me see what happens for WeChat.
</think>

<think>
I see - the `_send_to_platform` function imports `Platform` from `gateway.config` and then compares `platform == Platform.SLACK`, etc. But `platform` is passed as a string "weixin", not as a `Platform` enum. This comparison would fail for "weixin".

But wait, the comparison at line 339 `if platform == Platform.SLACK` - if platform is the string "weixin", this would be False. Then at line 347 onwards, the platform-specific logic would run for each platform. Let me see what happens for WeChat.
</think>


   347|    _MAX_LENGTHS = {
   348|        Platform.TELEGRAM: TelegramAdapter.MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH,
   349|        Platform.DISCORD: DiscordAdapter.MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH,
   350|        Platform.SLACK: SlackAdapter.MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH,
   351|    }
   352|    if _feishu_available:
   353|        _MAX_LENGTHS[Platform.FEISHU] = FeishuAdapter.MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH
   354|
   355|    # Smart-chunk the message to fit within platform limits.
   356|    # For short messages or platforms without a known limit this is a no-op.
   357|    # Telegram measures length in UTF-16 code units, not Unicode codepoints.
   358|    max_len = _MAX_LENGTHS.get(platform)
   359|    if max_len:
   360|        _len_fn = utf16_len if platform == Platform.TELEGRAM else None
   361|        chunks = BasePlatformAdapter.truncate_message(message, max_len, len_fn=_len_fn)
   362|    else:
   363|        chunks = [message]
   364|
   365|    # --- Telegram: special handling for media attachments ---
   366|    if platform == Platform.TELEGRAM:
   367|        last_result = None
   368|        for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks):
   369|            is_last = (i == len(chunks) - 1)
   370|            result = await _send_telegram(
   371|                pconfig.token,
   372|                chat_id,
   373|                chunk,
   374|                media_files=media_files if is_last else [],
   375|                thread_id=thread_id,
   376|            )
   377|

Use offset=377 to continue reading (showing 347-376 of 1051 lines)


<think>
I see. The code uses `platform == Platform.TELEGRAM`, `platform == Platform.SLACK`, etc. If `platform` is a string "weixin", these comparisons would be False (since "weixin" != Platform.TELEGRAM). So it would fall through to line 429-430 where it returns an error.

But wait, the test I ran shows the error was at line 430: `result = {"error": f"Direct sending not yet implemented for {platform.value}"}`. This means the code IS reaching the `else` branch, meaning `platform` is a string "weixin".

BUT - the actual cron delivery says `last_delivery_error: null`. How is that possible if `_send_to_platform` returns an error?

Oh, I think I see it now. When `platform` is a string "weixin", it would fall through to the else clause and return an error, but then in `_deliver_result`, the condition checking `result and result.get("error")` would catch that error. Unless `result` is None or doesn't have an error key in certain cases. Let me trace through what happens when the string "weixin" is passed to `_deliver_result` - it would hit the else branch and return an error dict, but maybe the error isn't being properly propagated back.

Wait, but the test I'm running locally is getting an AttributeError where the code tries to access `platform.value` on a string object, which means `platform` is definitely a string "weixin" and not an enum. So the issue might be that in the cron daemon context, the platform parameter is being passed as a string when it should be an enum value.
</think>

找到关键 bug 了！`platform` 是字符串 `"weixin"` 而不是枚举，但代码在 else 分支试图访问 `platform.value`。这在 cron standalone 投递时会导致 AttributeError 被 except 捕获，返回 `{"error": "..."}`。

但 cron 日志显示 `last_delivery_error: null`——说明 standalone 路径从未被执行。让亮检查 `_deliver_result` 中 live adapter 路径的 `loop` 判断条件：


   302|    # Prefer the live adapter when the gateway is running — this supports E2EE
   303|    # rooms (e.g. Matrix) where the standalone HTTP path cannot encrypt.
   304|    runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
   305|    if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():
   306|        send_metadata = {"thread_id": thread_id} if thread_id else None
   307|        try:
   308|            # Send cleaned text (MEDIA tags stripped) — not the raw content
   309|            text_to_send = cleaned_delivery_content.strip()
   310|            adapter_ok = True
   311|            if text_to_send:
   312|                future = asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe(
   313|                    runtime_adapter.send(chat_id, text_to_send, metadata=send_metadata),
   314|                    loop,
   315|                )
   316|                send_result = future.result(timeout=60)
   317|                if send_result and not getattr(send_result, "success", True):
   318|                    err = getattr(send_result, "error", "unknown")
   319|                    logger.warning(
   320|                        "Job '%s': live adapter send to %s:%s failed (%s), falling back to standalone",
   321|                        job["id"], platform_name, chat_id, err,
   322|                    )
   323|                    adapter_ok = False  # fall through to standalone path
   324|
   325|            # Send extracted media files as native attachments via the live adapter
   326|            if adapter_ok and media_files:
   327|                _send_media_via_adapter(runtime_adapter, chat_id, media_files, send_metadata, loop, job)
   328|
   329|            if adapter_ok:
   330|                logger.info("Job '%s': delivered to %s:%s via live adapter", job["id"], platform_name, chat_id)
   331|                return None
   332|        except Exception as e:
   333|            logger.warning(
   334|                "Job '%s': live adapter delivery to %s:%s failed (%s), falling back to standalone",
   335|                job["id"], platform_name, chat_id, e,
   336|            )
   337|
   338|    # Standalone path: run the async send in a fresh event loop (safe from any thread)
   339|    coro = _send_to_platform(platform, pconfig, chat_id, cleaned_delivery_content, thread_id=thread_id, media_files=media_files)
   340|    try:
   341|        result = asyncio.run(coro)
   342|

Use offset=342 to continue reading (showing 302-341 of 990 lines)


<think>
Now I understand! The flow is:

1. Line 304: `runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)` - if `adapters` is a dict with "weixin" key, this returns the WeChat adapter. If `adapters` is None or doesn't have "weixin", this returns None.
2. Line 305: If `runtime_adapter is not None` and `loop is not None` and `loop.is_running()` - enters live adapter path
3. Line 316: `send_result = future.result(timeout=60)` - calls the live adapter's `send()` method

The issue could be:
- If `runtime_adapter` is None (WeChat not in adapters), the live adapter path is skipped and standalone path runs. But standalone fails with AttributeError.

- If `runtime_adapter` is not None, the live adapter tries to send. If `send()` returns `success=False`, it falls through to standalone which also fails.

So the bug could be in either path. The real question is whether `adapters` in `_deliver_result` actually contains the WeChat adapter. I should trace how `tick()` is called and what's being passed as `adapters` to understand why `last_delivery_error` is null even though both paths seem to be failing.

Actually, looking back at my test - the standalone path is returning `None` when it hits the `else` branch at line 430, which means `_send_to_platform` returns `{"error": ...}` but that error check at line 357-360 might not be catching it the way I thought. I need to trace through what happens when the WeChat adapter isn't found in the adapters dict - does it skip the live adapter path entirely and go straight to standalone? So when `platform` is the string "weixin", the comparison `platform == Platform.WECHAT` evaluates to False, which means it never matches any of the enum cases and falls through to the error return at line 430. The issue is that `platform` needs to be converted from a string to the actual `Platform` enum value first, but that conversion isn't happening before the comparison.
</think>

亮发现了一个关键细节：`pconfig` 的 `extra` 字段根本没有被用来调用 `_send_weixin`！让亮看完整的 WeChat 分支：


return await _send_weixin(pconfig, chat_id, message, media_files=media_files)

async def _send_weixin(pconfig, chat_id, message, media_files=None):


<think>
Line 384 is where `_send_weixin` is called! Let me see the full context around line 384 and what the platform check looks like.
</think>


   378|                return result
   379|            last_result = result
   380|        return last_result
   381|
   382|    # --- Weixin: use the native one-shot adapter helper for text + media ---
   383|    if platform == Platform.WEIXIN:
   384|        return await _send_weixin(pconfig, chat_id, message, media_files=media_files)
   385|
   386|    # --- Non-Telegram platforms ---
   387|    if media_files and not message.strip():
   388|        return {
   389|            "error": (
   390|                f"send_message MEDIA delivery is currently only supported for telegram; "
   391|                f"target {platform.value} had only media attachments"
   392|            )
   393|        }
   394|    warning = None
   395|    if media_files:
   396|        warning = (
   397|            f"MEDIA attachments were omitted for {platform.value}; "
   398|            "native send_message media delivery is currently only supported for telegram"
   399|        )
   400|
   401|    last_result = None
   402|    for chunk in chunks:
   403|        if platform == Platform.DISCORD:
   404|            result = await _send_discord(pconfig.token, chat_id, chunk, thread_id=thread_id)
   405|        elif platform == Platform.SLACK:
   406|            result = await _send_slack(pconfig.token, chat_id, chunk)
   407|        elif platform == Platform.WHATSAPP:
   408|            result = await _send_whatsapp(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   409|        elif platform == Platform.SIGNAL:
   410|            result = await _send_signal(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   411|        elif platform == Platform.EMAIL:
   412|            result = await _send_email(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   413|        elif platform == Platform.SMS:
   414|            result = await _send_sms(pconfig.api_key, chat_id, chunk)
   415|        elif platform == Platform.MATTERMOST:
   416|            result = await _send_mattermost(pconfig.token, pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   417|        elif platform == Platform.MATRIX:
   418|            result = await _send_matrix(pconfig.token, pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   419|        elif platform == Platform.HOMEASSISTANT:
   420|            result = await _send_homeassistant(pconfig.token, pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   421|        elif platform == Platform.DINGTALK:
   422|            result = await _send_dingtalk(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   423|        elif platform == Platform.FEISHU:
   424|            result = await _send_feishu(pconfig, chat_id, chunk, thread_id=thread_id)
   425|        elif platform == Platform.WECOM:
   426|            result = await _send_wecom(pconfig.extra, chat_id, chunk)
   427|        elif platform == Platform.BLUEBUBBLES:
   428|

Use offset=428 to continue reading (showing 378-427 of 1051 lines)


<think>
Now I see the full picture! The `_send_to_platform` function:

1. First checks `platform == Platform.WEIXIN` at line 383. If `platform` is the string `"weixin"`, this comparison is False, so it skips line 384.
2. Then it checks many other platform enums (Discord, Slack, etc.) at lines 403-428. None match the string "weixin".
3. Finally at line 429-430, it hits the else branch and returns the error.

So the problem is clear: when `_send_to_platform` is called from the cron daemon's standalone path, `platform` is the string `"weixin"` (from the jobs.json `deliver` field), NOT the `Platform.WEIXIN` enum.

The string comparison fails against all the enum values, triggering the error handler. But `last_delivery_error` is null in jobs.json, which means either the standalone path isn't being reached despite the live adapter failing, or the error isn't being captured properly. Let me trace the execution: the live adapter path tries to send via `run_coroutine_threadsafe`, gets a `None` session returning `success=False`, sets `adapter_ok = False`, then falls through to the standalone path where the platform string mismatch causes the error to be returned and stored. But I'm realizing the live adapter might not be registered in `runner.adapters` for WeChat, which would mean `runtime_adapter` is `None` and the code skips the live adapter path entirely. The else clause at line 429 tries to access `platform.value`, which fails because `platform` is a string. But `_send_weixin` is actually defined at line 923 as a valid function, so it should be callable—the real issue is that string comparison never reaches it in the first place.

I need to figure out why `last_delivery_error` is null despite this error being raised. Either the error is caught and handled elsewhere, or `_send_to_platform` is never actually called with the string "weixin" during cron delivery. Let me check the actual cron output for today's job to see what really happened.
</think>

等等！亮注意到 `_send_weixin` 是在 line 384 被调用的（在 `platform == Platform.WEIXIN` 检查时）。这意味着只有 `platform` 是 `Platform.WEIXIN` 枚举时才会走这个分支。但在 cron standalone 路径中，`platform` 是字符串 `"weixin"`。

让亮查看 `_send_weixin` 的签名来理解 `pconfig` 是如何被使用的：


   923|async def _send_weixin(pconfig, chat_id, message, media_files=None):
   924|    """Send via Weixin iLink using the native adapter helper."""
   925|    try:
   926|        from gateway.platforms.weixin import check_weixin_requirements, send_weixin_direct
   927|        if not check_weixin_requirements():
   928|            return {"error": "Weixin requirements not met. Need aiohttp + cryptography."}
   929|    except ImportError:
   930|        return {"error": "Weixin adapter not available."}
   931|
   932|    try:
   933|        return await send_weixin_direct(
   934|            extra=pconfig.extra,
   935|            token=pconfig.token,
   936|            chat_id=chat_id,
   937|            message=message,
   938|            media_files=media_files,
   939|        )
   940|    except Exception as e:
   941|        return _error(f"Weixin send failed: {e}")
   942|
   943|
   944|async def _send_bluebubbles(extra, chat_id, message):
   945|    """Send via BlueBubbles iMessage server using the adapter's REST API."""
   946|    try:
   947|        from gateway.platforms.bluebubbles import BlueBubblesAdapter, check_bluebubbles_requirements
   948|        if not check_bluebubbles_requirements():
   949|            return {"error": "BlueBubbles requirements not met (need aiohttp + httpx)."}
   950|    except ImportError:
   951|        return {"error": "BlueBubbles adapter not available."}
   952|
   953|    try:
   954|        from gateway.config import PlatformConfig
   955|        pconfig = PlatformConfig(extra=extra)
   956|        adapter = BlueBubblesAdapter(pconfig)
   957|        connected = await adapter.connect()
   958|        if not connected:
   959|            return _error("BlueBubbles: failed to connect to server")
   960|        try:
   961|            result = await adapter.send(chat_id, message)
   962|            if not result.success:
   963|                return _error(f"BlueBubbles send failed: {result.error}")
   964|            return {"success": True, "platform": "bluebubbles", "chat_id": chat_id, "message_id": result.message_id}
   965|        finally:
   966|            await adapter.disconnect()
   967|    except Exception as e:
   968|        return _error(f"BlueBubbles send failed: {e}")
   969|
   970|
   971|async def _send_feishu(pconfig, chat_id, message, media_files=None, thread_id=None):
   972|    """Send via Feishu/Lark using the adapter's send pipeline."""
   973|    try:
   974|        from gateway.platforms.feishu import FeishuAdapter, FEISHU_AVAILABLE
   975|        if not FEISHU_AVAILABLE:
   976|            return {"error": "Feishu dependencies not installed. Run: pip install 'hermes-agent[feishu]'"}
   977|        from gateway.platforms.feishu import FEISHU_DOMAIN, LARK_DOMAIN
   978|    except ImportError:
   979|        return {"error": "Feishu dependencies not installed. Run: pip install 'hermes-agent[feishu]'"}
   980|
   981|    media_files = media_files or []
   982|
   983|

Use offset=983 to continue reading (showing 923-982 of 1051 lines)


<think>
Now I see. `_send_weixin` calls `send_weixin_direct(extra=pconfig.extra, token=pconfig.token, ...)`. The `pconfig` passed here is a dict (from jobs.json), not a `PlatformConfig` object. So `pconfig.extra` and `pconfig.token` would fail if `pconfig` is a dict.

Wait, but in `_send_to_platform`, `pconfig` is passed directly. In the standalone path of `_deliver_result`, how is `pconfig` constructed?

Let me look at how `_deliver_result` calls `_send_to_platform`. Let me see lines around 270-300 in scheduler.py to understand how `pconfig` is built.
</think>

<think>
Now I see. `_send_weixin` calls `send_weixin_direct(extra=pconfig.extra, token=pconfig.token, ...)`. The `pconfig` passed here is a dict (from jobs.json), not a `PlatformConfig` object. So `pconfig.extra` and `pconfig.token` would fail if `pconfig` is a dict.

Wait, but in `_send_to_platform`, `pconfig` is passed directly. In the standalone path of `_deliver_result`, how is `pconfig` constructed?

Let me look at how `_deliver_result` calls `_send_to_platform`. Let me see lines around 270-300 in scheduler.py to understand how `pconfig` is built.
</think>

需要看 `_deliver_result` 如何构建 `pconfig`：


   199|def _deliver_result(job: dict, content: str, adapters=None, loop=None) -> Optional[str]:
   200|    """
   201|    Deliver job output to the configured target (origin chat, specific platform, etc.).
   202|
   203|    When ``adapters`` and ``loop`` are provided (gateway is running), tries to
   204|    use the live adapter first — this supports E2EE rooms (e.g. Matrix) where
   205|    the standalone HTTP path cannot encrypt.  Falls back to standalone send if
   206|    the adapter path fails or is unavailable.
   207|
   208|    Returns None on success, or an error string on failure.
   209|    """
   210|    target = _resolve_delivery_target(job)
   211|    if not target:
   212|        if job.get("deliver", "local") != "local":
   213|            msg = f"no delivery target resolved for deliver={job.get('deliver', 'local')}"
   214|            logger.warning("Job '%s': %s", job["id"], msg)
   215|            return msg
   216|        return None  # local-only jobs don't deliver — not a failure
   217|
   218|    platform_name = target["platform"]
   219|    chat_id = target["chat_id"]
   220|    thread_id = target.get("thread_id")
   221|
   222|    # Diagnostic: log thread_id for topic-aware delivery debugging
   223|    origin = job.get("origin") or {}
   224|    origin_thread = origin.get("thread_id")
   225|    if origin_thread and not thread_id:
   226|        logger.warning(
   227|            "Job '%s': origin has thread_id=%s but delivery target lost it "
   228|            "(deliver=%s, target=%s)",
   229|            job["id"], origin_thread, job.get("deliver", "local"), target,
   230|        )
   231|    elif thread_id:
   232|        logger.debug(
   233|            "Job '%s': delivering to %s:%s thread_id=%s",
   234|            job["id"], platform_name, chat_id, thread_id,
   235|        )
   236|
   237|    from tools.send_message_tool import _send_to_platform
   238|    from gateway.config import load_gateway_config, Platform
   239|
   240|    platform_map = {
   241|        "telegram": Platform.TELEGRAM,
   242|        "discord": Platform.DISCORD,
   243|        "slack": Platform.SLACK,
   244|        "whatsapp": Platform.WHATSAPP,
   245|        "signal": Platform.SIGNAL,
   246|        "matrix": Platform.MATRIX,
   247|        "mattermost": Platform.MATTERMOST,
   248|        "homeassistant": Platform.HOMEASSISTANT,
   249|        "dingtalk": Platform.DINGTALK,
   250|        "feishu": Platform.FEISHU,
   251|        "wecom": Platform.WECOM,
   252|        "wecom_callback": Platform.WECOM_CALLBACK,
   253|        "weixin": Platform.WEIXIN,
   254|        "email": Platform.EMAIL,
   255|        "sms": Platform.SMS,
   256|        "bluebubbles": Platform.BLUEBUBBLES,
   257|    }
   258|    platform = platform_map.get(platform_name.lower())
   259|

Use offset=259 to continue reading (showing 199-258 of 990 lines)


<think>
Found it! Lines 240-258 show the `platform_map` that converts string platform names to `Platform` enum values. So at line 258, `platform = platform_map.get(platform_name.lower())` returns the `Platform.WEIXIN` enum, NOT the string "weixin".

So `_send_to_platform` IS called with `platform=Platform.WEIXIN` (the enum), which means the comparison `platform == Platform.WEIXIN` at line 383 in `send_message_tool.py` SHOULD match!

But then why did my test fail? Let me re-check my test. Oh! In my test, I called `_send_to_platform("weixin", ...)` with the STRING "weixin", not the enum.

That's why it failed! The actual cron daemon calls it with the enum, which should work. So if the enum conversion is correct and `_send_to_platform` receives `Platform.WEIXIN`, then the delivery should go through. But `last_delivery_error` is null and the user didn't receive the message, so something else is breaking in the actual execution flow.

Let me reconsider the failure point. The live adapter path calls `runtime_adapter.send()` in a thread with `success=False`, which sets `adapter_ok = False` and should trigger the standalone fallback. But I'm wondering if the issue is that `pconfig` passed to `_send_to_platform` isn't properly constructed—the job deliver target is `"weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat"`, and I need to trace how that's resolved and whether the resulting config object has the right structure for the standalone path to work.
</think>

找到了！Line 258：`platform = platform_map.get(platform_name.lower())` 返回 `Platform.WEIXIN` 枚举。所以 standalone 路径是正确的（使用枚举）。问题一定在别处。让亮看 `pconfig` 是怎么构建的：


   258|    platform = platform_map.get(platform_name.lower())
   259|    if not platform:
   260|        msg = f"unknown platform '{platform_name}'"
   261|        logger.warning("Job '%s': %s", job["id"], msg)
   262|        return msg
   263|
   264|    try:
   265|        config = load_gateway_config()
   266|    except Exception as e:
   267|        msg = f"failed to load gateway config: {e}"
   268|        logger.error("Job '%s': %s", job["id"], msg)
   269|        return msg
   270|
   271|    pconfig = config.platforms.get(platform)
   272|    if not pconfig or not pconfig.enabled:
   273|        msg = f"platform '{platform_name}' not configured/enabled"
   274|        logger.warning("Job '%s': %s", job["id"], msg)
   275|        return msg
   276|
   277|    # Optionally wrap the content with a header/footer so the user knows this
   278|    # is a cron delivery.  Wrapping is on by default; set cron.wrap_response: false
   279|    # in config.yaml for clean output.
   280|    wrap_response = True
   281|    try:
   282|        user_cfg = load_config()
   283|        wrap_response = user_cfg.get("cron", {}).get("wrap_response", True)
   284|    except Exception:
   285|        pass
   286|
   287|    if wrap_response:
   288|        task_name = job.get("name", job["id"])
   289|        delivery_content = (
   290|            f"Cronjob Response: {task_name}\n"
   291|            f"-------------\n\n"
   292|            f"{content}\n\n"
   293|            f"Note: The agent cannot see this message, and therefore cannot respond to it."
   294|        )
   295|    else:
   296|        delivery_content = content
   297|
   298|

Use offset=298 to continue reading (showing 258-297 of 990 lines)


<think>
Now I see. At line 271: `pconfig = config.platforms.get(platform)`. This gets the `PlatformConfig` for the WeChat platform from the gateway config. This is a proper `PlatformConfig` object (not a dict), which has `.extra` and `.token` attributes.

So `_send_weixin` is called with a proper `PlatformConfig` object, which should work.

Now I'm confused about why the user didn't receive the message if:
1. The job ran successfully
2. The standalone path should have been used
3. `_send_weixin` should have worked with the `PlatformConfig` object

Let me re-read the `_send_weixin` function to see if there could be any silent failures. At line 933: `return await send_weixin_direct(extra=pconfig.extra, token=pconfig.token, chat_id=chat_id, message=message, media_files=media_files)`.

Looking at `send_weixin_direct`, it also requires `extra` and `token` from the PlatformConfig. I need to check what the gateway config actually stores for WeChat to see if these fields are populated correctly.
</think>

<think>
Now I see. At line 271: `pconfig = config.platforms.get(platform)`. This gets the `PlatformConfig` for the WeChat platform from the gateway config. This is a proper `PlatformConfig` object (not a dict), which has `.extra` and `.token` attributes.

So `_send_weixin` is called with a proper `PlatformConfig` object, which should work.

Now I'm confused about why the user didn't receive the message if:
1. The job ran successfully
2. The standalone path should have been used
3. `_send_weixin` should have worked with the `PlatformConfig` object

Let me re-read the `_send_weixin` function to see if there could be any silent failures. At line 933: `return await send_weixin_direct(extra=pconfig.extra, token=pconfig.token, chat_id=chat_id, message=message, media_files=media_files)`.

Looking at `send_weixin_direct`, it also requires `extra` and `token` from the PlatformConfig. I need to check what the gateway config actually stores for WeChat to see if these fields are populated correctly.
</think>

好，`pconfig` 来自 `config.platforms.get(Platform.WEIXIN)`，这是正确的 `PlatformConfig` 对象。让亮直接用枚举测试 WeChat standalone 发送：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from gateway.config import Platform
from tools.send_message_tool import _send_to_platform
from gateway.config import load_gateway_config

config = load_gateway_config()
pconfig = config.platforms.get(Platform.WEIXIN)
print(f"pconfig: {pconfig}")
print(f"pconfig.enabled: {pconfig.enabled}")
print(f"pconfig.extra: {pconfig.extra}")
print(f"pconfig.token: {pconfig.token}")

async def test():
    result = await _send_to_platform(
        Platform.WEIXIN,
        pconfig,
        "o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat",
        "【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24 测试消息"
    )
    print(f"Result: {result}")

asyncio.run(test())
PYEOF


Output:
pconfig: PlatformConfig(enabled=True, token='1adc5ad9b781@im.bot:06000018d266de4fb83dcb4d588ae271477a7d', api_key=None, home_channel=HomeChannel(platform=<Platform.WEIXIN: 'weixin'>, chat_id='o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat', name='Home'), reply_to_mode='first', extra={'account_id': '1adc5ad9b781@im.bot', 'base_url': 'https://ilinkai.weixin.qq.com', 'cdn_base_url': 'https://novac2c.cdn.weixin.qq.com/c2c', 'dm_policy': 'pairing', 'group_policy': 'open'})
pconfig.enabled: True
pconfig.extra: {'account_id': '1adc5ad9b781@im.bot', 'base_url': 'https://ilinkai.weixin.qq.com', 'cdn_base_url': 'https://novac2c.cdn.weixin.qq.com/c2c', 'dm_policy': 'pairing', 'group_policy': 'open'}
pconfig.token: 1adc5ad9b781@im.bot:06000018d266de4fb83dcb4d588ae271477a7d
asyncio - DEBUG - Using selector: EpollSelector
gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9
Result: {'success': True, 'platform': 'weixin', 'chat_id': 'o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat', 'message_id': 'hermes-weixin-5897e0e14a7945f8a29a31664f65ad37', 'context_token_used': True}


<think>
Excellent! The standalone WeChat send worked! It returned `{'success': True, ...}`. So the standalone path is working correctly when called with `Platform.WEIXIN` enum.

Now the question is: why did the cron job's standalone path not work? Since the standalone path DOES work, and `last_delivery_error` is null, maybe the live adapter path is actually succeeding? But the WeChat adapter's `_session` should be None in the cron daemon thread...

Wait - let me re-examine the live adapter path. The cron daemon thread calls `tick(verbose=False, adapters=runner.adapters, loop=asyncio.get_running_loop())`. The `adapters` dict contains the live WeChat adapter.

In the live adapter path, `send_result` comes back with `success=False` and an error message. The code then tries to access `send_result.error`, but the result object might not have an `.error` attribute—it could be stored differently, like in a dictionary instead of as a direct attribute.

Let me check the `SendResult` class definition to understand its structure. Actually, thinking about this more carefully: if the WeChat adapter's `send()` method is returning `success=False`, the code sets `adapter_ok = False` and falls through to the standalone path. Since the standalone path works in testing, maybe the issue is that the gateway itself isn't running when the cron job executes? The `last_delivery_error` being null suggests the delivery was attempted, but I need to verify whether the gateway daemon is actually active.
</think>

standalone 路径完全可以工作！返回 `success=True`。问题一定在 live adapter 路径。让亮确认 gateway 进程状态：

ps aux | grep -E "hermes|gateway|run.py" | grep -v grep | head -10


Output:
root     1967372  0.1  5.0 1316764 101140 ?      Ssl  Apr14  15:21 /root/.hermes/hermes-agent/venv/bin/python -m hermes_cli.main gateway run --replace
root     2947207  0.3 18.4 22848632 370732 ?     Sl   Apr01 124:50 openclaw-gateway
root     3493772  0.0  0.0  13132   664 ?        S    Apr17   0:00 /usr/bin/bash -lic cd /root/.hermes/workspace && python3 -m http.server 6666 &


<think>
The gateway is running (PID 1967372). So `runner.adapters` should contain the WeChat adapter. The `loop` passed to `cron_tick` should be the gateway's main event loop.

Now let me trace through what happens in the live adapter path:
1. `runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)` - this gets the WeChat adapter
2. `loop.is_running()` returns True (the gateway loop is running)
3. `runtime_adapter.send()` is called via `run_coroutine_threadsafe`

But the WeChat adapter's `_session` is None (it's not connected in the daemon thread context).

Wait, I need to reconsider whether the WeChat adapter is actually registered in `runner.adapters` at all. Let me check what adapters are actually available in the running gateway.
</think>

<think>
The gateway is running (PID 1967372). So `runner.adapters` should contain the WeChat adapter. The `loop` passed to `cron_tick` should be the gateway's main event loop.

Now let me trace through what happens in the live adapter path:
1. `runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)` - this gets the WeChat adapter
2. `loop.is_running()` returns True (the gateway loop is running)
3. `runtime_adapter.send()` is called via `run_coroutine_threadsafe`

But the WeChat adapter's `_session` is None (it's not connected in the daemon thread context).

Wait, I need to reconsider whether the WeChat adapter is actually registered in `runner.adapters` at all. Let me check what adapters are actually available in the running gateway.
</think>

Gateway 在运行。让亮检查 `runner.adapters` 里有没有 WeChat：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio
from gateway.run import HermesGateway

# Just inspect the adapters by looking at the gateway state
# We can't easily get runner.adapters without connecting, but let's check the config
from gateway.config import load_gateway_config, Platform

config = load_gateway_config()
print("Configured platforms:")
for p, pconfig in config.platforms.items():
    if pconfig.enabled:
        print(f"  {p}: enabled, home={pconfig.home_channel}")

# Check if we can find the gateway process adapters
import psutil
gateway_pid = 1967372
proc = psutil.Process(gateway_pid)
print(f"\nGateway PID {gateway_pid}:")
print(f"  cmdline: {' '.join(proc.cmdline()[:3])}")
PYEOF


Output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
ImportError: cannot import name 'HermesGateway' from 'gateway.run' (/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/gateway/run.py)


<think>
Let me try a different approach. Let me check the gateway's registered adapters by looking at the gateway config file and the weixin adapter.
</think>

<think>
Let me try a different approach. Let me check the gateway's registered adapters by looking at the gateway config file and the weixin adapter.
</think>

gateway 启用了 WeChat。让亮直接测试 live adapter 路径中的 `send()` 调用，看看它到底返回什么：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio
import logging
import sys

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)

# Simulate what the cron daemon does - get runner.adapters and loop
# We need to find the gateway's adapters from the running process
# Since we can't easily get them, let's just test the live adapter path directly

from gateway.config import Platform, load_gateway_config
from gateway.platforms.weixin import WeixinAdapter

config = load_gateway_config()
pconfig = config.platforms.get(Platform.WEIXIN)
print(f"WeChat pconfig: enabled={pconfig.enabled}, extra={pconfig.extra}")

# Create adapter and test send
adapter = WeixinAdapter(pconfig)
print(f"Adapter._session: {adapter._session}")

# Now simulate what run_coroutine_threadsafe would do
async def test_send():
    result = await adapter.send("o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat", "测试消息 from live adapter")
    print(f"Live send result: {result}")
    print(f"success: {getattr(result, 'success', 'N/A')}")
    print(f"error: {getattr(result, 'error', 'N/A')}")
    return result

result = asyncio.run(test_send())
PYEOF


Output:
WeChat pconfig: enabled=True, extra={'account_id': '1adc5ad9b781@im.bot', 'base_url': 'https://ilinkai.weixin.qq.com', 'cdn_base_url': 'https://novac2c.cdn.weixin.qq.com/c2c', 'dm_policy': 'pairing', 'group_policy': 'open'}
Adapter._session: None
asyncio - DEBUG - Using selector: EpollSelector
Live send result: SendResult(success=False, message_id=None, error='Not connected', raw_response=None, retryable=False)
success: False
error: Not connected


<think>
So the live adapter `send()` returns `SendResult(success=False, error='Not connected')` when `_session` is None. This is exactly what I expected.Now in `_deliver_result`, when `send_result.success == False`:1. `err = getattr(send_result, "error", "unknown")` -> `err = "Not connected"`
2. `logger.warning(...)` is called (but logger level is WARNING so this might not show)
3. `adapter_ok = False` -> falls through to standalone path

The standalone path calls `_send_to_platform` which eventually calls `send_weixin_direct`. We verified this works.So why isn't the user receiving the message?WAIT.

I need to verify whether the standalone path is actually being invoked when the live adapter fails. The `SendResult` object returned from the live adapter has an `error` attribute set to "Not connected", so when the code checks `if send_result and not getattr(send_result, "success", True):`, it should evaluate to True and trigger the fallback. But something's preventing the standalone path from executing.

Let me trace through the cron daemon's execution path more carefully. It calls `cron_tick` which then calls `_deliver_result`, and I'm seeing output files were created at 17:31, 17:34, 17:42, and 17:49 today. The real issue might be that the gateway's event loop isn't actually running when the daemon calls `is_running()` — the gateway could be using `asyncio.run()` which creates a fresh event loop and closes it, meaning the daemon's reference to `get_running_loop()` might not point to the active gateway loop.

Actually, looking at the gateway setup, it's running `asyncio.run(self._run())` which creates a new event loop and runs it to completion. But the cron daemon starts a separate background thread that holds its own reference to whatever loop was running when it started. If the gateway is already done running by the time the cron job fires, that background thread's loop reference would be invalid or the daemon thread wouldn't even be running anymore. Yet the gateway process is still active, so something's not adding up here.

Wait, I think I see the real issue now. The gateway daemon thread is created as a background thread alongside the main asyncio event loop, so it should have access to that same running loop. The cron jobs are definitely executing since I'm seeing output files, and `mark_job_run` is being called with a successful status. But if the live adapter is returning `success=False` during delivery, something in the gateway's internal state must be preventing the message from actually being sent even though it reports success.

The cron daemon is passing the gateway's event loop and adapters to the tick function, which then calls the delivery method. When the WeChat send fails with `success=False`, it should fall back to the standalone path. But maybe that fallback isn't actually executing, or maybe the error happens after the success status is already recorded.

I'm wondering if the gateway process crashed or restarted between when the cron job ran and now. The `openclaw-gateway` process has been running since April 1st with over 124 hours of CPU time, while the hermes-gateway started on April 14th. They might be different processes entirely, which could explain why the state isn't consistent.

Looking at the cron job's `last_delivery_error: null`, it seems like delivery was attempted but either succeeded without actually sending to WeChat, or failed in a way that wasn't captured. I should check the hermes-gateway logs to see what actually happened during that 17:30 delivery window.
</think>

live adapter 路径返回 `success=False, error='Not connected'`。这应该会触发 fallback。但用户的 `last_delivery_error: null` 说明 fallback 成功了（或者从未执行到这里）。

让亮直接跑一次 job1 并开启完整日志看看 live vs standalone 到底走了哪条路：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

# CRON logger to DEBUG
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
cron_logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
cron_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

# send_message_tool logger to DEBUG
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

# Also test the actual _deliver_result with a mock job
from cron.scheduler import _deliver_result, save_job_output, get_job_config

# Load job 1
with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
job = next(j for j in data['jobs'] if j['id'] == '5063251e7794')

# Content from the latest output
content = """【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24

1. 今年1-3月彩票销量下滑46亿，平均每人买了100块 😂 大家都去填梦想了

2. DeepSeek V4发布，百万上下文直接标配！AI进入"免费大杯"时代 ☕

3. 北京一季度电动自行车事故已死亡44人 🚲 速度与激情，现实版

4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产，曾经900亿市值只剩54亿 📉 娱乐圈寒气逼人

5. 特朗普：干嘛用核武器？常规手段就能彻底摧毁伊朗 😏

#喷嚏图卦"""

# Test standalone only (no adapters) - to simulate standalone fallback
print("=== TEST: standalone path (adapters=None, loop=None) ===")
result = _deliver_result(job, content, adapters=None, loop=None)
print(f"Result: {result}")
PYEOF


Output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 13, in <module>
ImportError: cannot import name 'get_job_config' from 'cron.scheduler' (/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/cron/scheduler.py)


<think>
OK let me remove the `get_job_config` import.
</think>

<think>
OK let me remove the `get_job_config` import.
</think>

<think>
OK let me remove the `get_job_config` import.
</think>

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

# CRON logger to DEBUG
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
cron_logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
cron_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

# send_message_tool logger to DEBUG
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from cron.scheduler import _deliver_result

# Load job 1
with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
job = next(j for j in data['jobs'] if j['id'] == '5063251e7794')

# Content from the latest output
content = """【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24

1. 今年1-3月彩票销量下滑46亿，平均每人买了100块 😂 大家都去填梦想了

2. DeepSeek V4发布，百万上下文直接标配！AI进入"免费大杯"时代 ☕

3. 北京一季度电动自行车事故已死亡44人 🚲 速度与激情，现实版

4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产，曾经900亿市值只剩54亿 📉 娱乐圈寒气逼人

5. 特朗普：干嘛用核武器？常规手段就能彻底摧毁伊朗 😏

#喷嚏图卦"""

# Test standalone only (no adapters) - to simulate standalone fallback
print("=== TEST: standalone path (adapters=None, loop=None) ===")
result = _deliver_result(job, content, adapters=None, loop=None)
print(f"Result: {result}")
PYEOF


Output:
=== TEST: standalone path (adapters=None, loop=None) ===
asyncio - DEBUG - Using selector: EpollSelector
gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9
cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat
Result: None


<think>
The standalone path works perfectly! `Result: None` (success), and the WeChat message was sent.

So the standalone path works. The issue must be in the live adapter path. When the gateway is running and `adapters` contains the WeChat adapter, the live adapter path is tried first. Let me now test with the live adapter path.

Let me find out what `runner.adapters` contains for the running gateway. I need to check if the WeChat adapter is actually registered in the gateway's adapters.

Actually, wait. Looking at the test output: when I called `_deliver_result` with `adapters=None, loop=None`, it went to the standalone path and succeeded. This is exactly what should happen when the live adapter path fails.

I'm wondering if the live adapter path is actually succeeding when it shouldn't be, or if the `deliver` field in jobs.json is somehow being parsed incorrectly. Let me reconsider the flow when `adapters` and `loop` are both provided - the live adapter path would be tried first, and maybe the issue is that the result isn't being propagated back correctly to `_deliver_result`.

Since the standalone path works fine when called directly, the problem likely occurs when going through the live adapter path first. Let me trace through what happens when `adapters` contains the WeChat adapter and `loop` is the running event loop - specifically when the live send returns `success=False` and falls back to standalone, but something in that fallback mechanism isn't working as expected.

I should check if the gateway's `runner.adapters` dictionary is actually being passed correctly to the cron tick function, since that's what determines whether the live adapter gets used at all.
</think>

standalone 完美成功！`Result: None`（无错误）。现在测试 live adapter 路径。让亮直接连到运行中 gateway 的 adapters：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
cron_logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
cron_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

# Find the running gateway's adapters by connecting to its control port or using a probe
# Since we can't directly access the running gateway's memory, let's simulate the scenario:
# The gateway stores adapters in runner.adapters which is passed to cron_ticker

# Let's check: is the WeChat adapter registered in the gateway's adapters?
# We can test this by checking what the gateway _start_cron_ticker receives

# For now, let's just manually create what the gateway would pass:
from gateway.config import Platform, load_gateway_config

config = load_gateway_config()
pconfig = config.platforms.get(Platform.WEIXIN)
print(f"WeChat pconfig.home_channel: {pconfig.home_channel}")

# The key question: what platform name does _resolve_delivery_target return?
# Let's check _resolve_delivery_target for our job
from cron.scheduler import _resolve_delivery_target

with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
job = next(j for j in data['jobs'] if j['id'] == '5063251e7794')

target = _resolve_delivery_target(job)
print(f"Delivery target: {target}")
print(f"Platform name: {target['platform']}")
print(f"Chat ID: {target['chat_id']}")

# Now let's see: when platform_name="weixin", does platform_map return the right enum?
platform_map = {
    "telegram": Platform.TELEGRAM,
    "weixin": Platform.WEIXIN,
}
platform = platform_map.get(target['platform'].lower())
print(f"Resolved platform enum: {platform}")
PYEOF


Output:
WeChat pconfig.home_channel: HomeChannel(platform=<Platform.WEIXIN: 'weixin'>, chat_id='o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat', name='Home')
Delivery target: {'platform': 'weixin', 'chat_id': 'o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat', 'thread_id': None}
Platform name: weixin
Chat ID: o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat
Resolved platform enum: Platform.WEIXIN


<think>
Good. The platform resolution is correct. `Platform.WEIXIN` enum. `pconfig.home_channel` shows `o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.Now I need to understand: does the gateway's `runner.adapters` contain the WeChat adapter? If it does, then the live adapter path is used. If not, the standalone path is used.

Let me think about this from a different angle. The gateway process (PID 1967372) is `hermes_cli.main gateway run`. When it starts, it loads the gateway config and initializes adapters.

I'm wondering if the WeChat adapter might not be properly initialized in the gateway's adapter registry. Let me check whether the gateway is actually persisting the WeChat adapter state across restarts, and then run a direct test to see if the message gets delivered to WeChat.
</think>

好，platform 解析完全正确。让亮直接重新跑一次 job1，看看用户能不能在微信里收到（standalone 路径）：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
cron_logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
cron_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

from cron.scheduler import _deliver_result

with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
job = next(j for j in data['jobs'] if j['id'] == '5063251e7794')

# Use the actual content that was generated today
content = """【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24

1. 今年1-3月彩票销量下滑46亿，平均每人买了100块 😂 大家都去填梦想了

2. DeepSeek V4发布，百万上下文直接标配！AI进入"免费大杯"时代 ☕

3. 北京一季度电动自行车事故已死亡44人 🚲 速度与激情，现实版

4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产，曾经900亿市值只剩54亿 📉 娱乐圈寒气逼人

5. 特朗普：干嘛用核武器？常规手段就能彻底摧毁伊朗 😏

#喷嚏图卦"""

# Simulate standalone delivery with the actual gateway adapters
# We can't easily get the runner.adapters, but let's try with the running loop
import threading
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)

# Just use standalone (no adapters) - this works
print("=== Testing standalone ===")
result = _deliver_result(job, content, adapters=None, loop=None)
print(f"Result: {result}")
PYEOF


Output:
asyncio - DEBUG - Using selector: EpollSelector
=== Testing standalone ===
asyncio - DEBUG - Using selector: EpollSelector
gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9
cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat
Result: None