<think>
Excellent! The standalone path works perfectly and delivers to WeChat successfully! The log shows: `gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9` and then `cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

Now the key question is: why did the cron daemon's delivery fail to deliver the message?

The answer must be in the live adapter path. When the gateway is running, the cron daemon passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()`. If the WeChat adapter is in `runner.adapters`, then the live adapter path is tried first.

So here's what I think is happening: the live adapter gets tried first and returns `success=False` with an error like "Not connected", which sets `adapter_ok = False` and should trigger the fallback to standalone. But maybe the standalone path isn't actually being executed, or perhaps the exception is being caught somewhere in the wrapper. I need to trace through the actual cron daemon's tick function to see how it's handling the delivery result.

The job ran at 17:30 and the output file was saved, so the job definitely executed. But if the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd skip the live adapter path entirely, going straight to standalone. The issue might be that standalone is somehow failing or the result isn't being captured properly. Let me actually look at what `_send_to_platform` returns when it fails.

When `_send_weixin` encounters an error like `{"error": "Weixin send failed: ..."}`, that error gets returned, then `_deliver_result` checks `result.get("error")` and logs it as a delivery error. So `last_delivery_error` should be set. But it's `null`, which means either the standalone path never ran, or it succeeded without returning an error. Maybe the real problem is that `_send_to_platform` is receiving a string instead of a `Platform` enum, causing it to hit the else branch and return an error dict that somehow isn't being caught properly. Looking at the jobs.json output, the `deliver` field is just the string `"weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat"` with no associated data, so I need to trace through what `_resolve_delivery_target` actually does with this value.
</think>

<think>
Excellent! The standalone path works perfectly and delivers to WeChat successfully! The log shows: `gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9` and then `cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

Now the key question is: why did the cron daemon's delivery fail to deliver the message?

The answer must be in the live adapter path. When the gateway is running, the cron daemon passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()`. If the WeChat adapter is in `runner.adapters`, then the live adapter path is tried first.

But wait - I think I've been missing something. Let me re-read the flow more carefully.

The job ran at 17:30 and the output file was saved, so the job definitely executed. But if the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd skip the live adapter path entirely, going straight to standalone. The issue might be that standalone is somehow failing or the result isn't being captured properly. Let me actually look at what `_send_to_platform` returns when it fails.

When `_send_weixin` encounters an error like `{"error": "Weixin send failed: ..."}`, that error gets returned, then `_deliver_result` checks `result.get("error")` and logs it as a delivery error. So `last_delivery_error` should be set. But it's `null`, which means either the standalone path never ran, or it succeeded without returning an error. Maybe the real problem is that `_send_to_platform` is receiving a string instead of a `Platform` enum, causing it to hit the else branch and return an error dict that somehow isn't being caught properly. Looking at the jobs.json output, the `deliver` field is just the string `"weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat"` with no associated data, so I need to trace through what `_resolve_delivery_target` actually does with this value.
</think>

<think>
Excellent! The standalone path works perfectly and delivers to WeChat successfully! The log shows: `gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9` and then `cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

Now the key question is: why did the cron daemon's delivery fail to deliver the message?

The answer must be in the live adapter path. When the gateway is running, the cron daemon passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()`. If the WeChat adapter is in `runner.adapters`, then the live adapter path is tried first.

But wait - I think I've been missing something. Let me re-read the flow more carefully.

The job ran at 17:30 and the output file was saved, so the job definitely executed. But if the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd skip the live adapter path entirely, going straight to standalone. The issue might be that standalone is somehow failing or the result isn't being captured properly. Let me actually look at what `_send_to_platform` returns when it fails.

When `_send_weixin` encounters an error like `{"error": "Weixin send failed: ..."}`, that error gets returned, then `_deliver_result` checks `result.get("error")` and logs it as a delivery error. So `last_delivery_error` should be set. But it's `null`, which means either the standalone path never ran, or it succeeded without returning an error. Maybe the real problem is that `_send_to_platform` is receiving a string instead of a `Platform` enum, causing it to hit the else branch and return an error dict that somehow isn't being caught properly. Looking at the jobs.json output, the `deliver` field is just the string `"weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat"` with no associated data, so I need to trace through what `_resolve_delivery_target` actually does with this value.
</think>

standalone 完美投递成功！但 cron daemon 里却失败了。亮需要理解 cron daemon 的 `_start_cron_ticker` 到底传了什么 `adapters` 给 `tick`。让亮检查 gateway 启动时如何初始化 adapters：

Explanation:
Excellent! The standalone path works perfectly and delivers to WeChat successfully! The log shows: `gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9` and then `cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

Now the key question is: why did the cron daemon's delivery fail to deliver the message?

The answer must be in the live adapter path. When the gateway is running, the cron daemon passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()`. If the WeChat adapter is in `runner.adapters`, then the live adapter path is tried first.

So here's what I think is happening: the live adapter gets tried first and returns `success=False` with an error like "Not connected", which sets `adapter_ok = False` and should trigger the fallback to standalone. But maybe the standalone path isn't actually being executed, or perhaps the exception is being caught somewhere in the wrapper. I need to trace through the actual cron daemon's tick function to see how it's handling the delivery result.

The job ran at 17:30 and the output file was saved, so the job definitely executed. But if the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd skip the live adapter path entirely, going straight to standalone. The issue might be that standalone is somehow failing or the result isn't being captured properly. Let me actually look at what `_send_to_platform` returns when it fails.

When `_send_weixin` encounters an error like `{"error": "Weixin send failed: ..."}`, that error gets returned, then `_deliver_result` checks `result.get("error")` and logs it as a delivery error. So `last_delivery_error` should be set. But it's `null`, which means either the standalone path never ran, or it succeeded without returning an error. Maybe the real problem is that `_send_to_platform` is receiving a string instead of a `Platform` enum, causing it to hit the else branch and return an error dict that somehow isn't being caught properly. Looking at the jobs.json output, the `deliver` field is just the string `"weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat"` with no associated data, so I need to trace through what `_resolve_delivery_target` actually does with this value.

Excellent! The standalone path works perfectly and delivers to WeChat successfully! The log shows: `gateway.platforms.weixin - INFO - weixin: restored 1 context token(s) for 1adc5ad9` and then `cron.scheduler - INFO - Job '5063251e7794': delivered to weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat`.

Now the key question is: why did the cron daemon's delivery fail to deliver the message?

The answer must be in the live adapter path. When the gateway is running, the cron daemon passes `adapters=runner.adapters` and `loop=asyncio.get_running_loop()`. If the WeChat adapter is in `runner.adapters`, then the live adapter path is tried first.

But wait - I think I've been missing something. Let me re-read the flow more carefully.

The job ran at 17:30 and the output file was saved, so the job definitely executed. But if the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd skip the live adapter path entirely, going straight to standalone. The issue might be that standalone is somehow failing or the result isn't being captured properly. Let me actually look at what `_send_to_platform` returns when it fails.

When `_send_weixin` encounters an error like `{"error": "Weixin send failed: ..."}`, that error gets returned, then `_deliver_result` checks `result.get("error")` and logs it as a delivery error. So `last_delivery_error` should be set. But it's `null`, which means either the standalone path never ran, or it succeeded without returning an error. Maybe the real problem is that `_send_to_platform` is receiving a string instead of a `Platform` enum, causing it to hit the else branch and return an error dict that somehow isn't being caught properly. Looking at the jobs.json output, the `deliver` field is just the string `"weixin:o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat"` with no associated data, so I need to trace through what `_resolve_delivery_target` actually does with this value.


def _start_cron_ticker(stop_event: threading.Event, adapters=None, loop=None, interval: int = 60):


<think>
Let me look at line 8945 to see how `_start_cron_ticker` is called - i.e., how `adapters` is passed to it.
</think>

<think>
Let me look at line 8945 to see how `_start_cron_ticker` is called - i.e., how `adapters` is passed to it.
</think>

<think>
Let me look at line 8945 to see how `_start_cron_ticker` is called - i.e., how `adapters` is passed to it.
</think>


  8930|    if runner.should_exit_cleanly:
  8931|        if runner.exit_reason:
  8932|            logger.error("Gateway exiting cleanly: %s", runner.exit_reason)
  8933|        return True
  8934|
  8935|    # Write PID file so CLI can detect gateway is running
  8936|    import atexit
  8937|    from gateway.status import write_pid_file, remove_pid_file
  8938|    write_pid_file()
  8939|    atexit.register(remove_pid_file)
  8940|
  8941|    # Start background cron ticker so scheduled jobs fire automatically.
  8942|    # Pass the event loop so cron delivery can use live adapters (E2EE support).
  8943|    cron_stop = threading.Event()
  8944|    cron_thread = threading.Thread(
  8945|        target=_start_cron_ticker,
  8946|        args=(cron_stop,),
  8947|        kwargs={"adapters": runner.adapters, "loop": asyncio.get_running_loop()},
  8948|        daemon=True,
  8949|        name="cron-ticker",
  8950|    )
  8951|    cron_thread.start()
  8952|
  8953|    # Wait for shutdown
  8954|    await runner.wait_for_shutdown()
  8955|
  8956|    if runner.should_exit_with_failure:
  8957|        if runner.exit_reason:
  8958|            logger.error("Gateway exiting with failure: %s", runner.exit_reason)
  8959|        return False
  8960|

Use offset=8960 to continue reading (showing 8930-8959 of 9003 lines)


<think>
Found it! Line 8947: `kwargs={"adapters": runner.adapters, "loop": asyncio.get_running_loop()}`. The `adapters` is `runner.adapters` and the `loop` is `asyncio.get_running_loop()`.

Now the question is: what does `runner.adapters` contain? Is the WeChat adapter registered there?

Let me check `runner.adapters` by looking at the `GatewayRunner` class. Actually, I should check if there's a way to inspect the running gateway's adapters. Maybe I can add a temporary probe.

Wait - I just realized something. Let me look at the cron daemon initialization. The daemon thread is started at line 8951: `cron_thread.start()`.

The daemon thread captures the current running loop via `asyncio.get_running_loop()`, but `runner.adapters` might not include the WeChat adapter at all. If it's `None` or empty, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd take the standalone path instead. The gateway's `should_exit_cleanly` might be set, which would prevent the cron daemon from even running.

Actually, looking at the gateway command, it's running with `--replace`, so the cron thread should definitely be active. The `runner.adapters` dict might be populated lazily or after initialization completes. When the cron daemon checks `is_running()` on the loop, it returns `True`, so the live adapter path gets attempted. I need to figure out whether the WeChat adapter is actually registered in `runner.adapters` for this gateway instance.

Let me test the live adapter path directly by simulating what happens when `adapters` contains the WeChat adapter and `loop` is the running event loop.
</think>

找到了！Line 8947: `kwargs={"adapters": runner.adapters, "loop": asyncio.get_running_loop()}`。关键问题是：`runner.adapters` 里有没有 WeChat adapter？

让亮写一个诊断脚本，连到运行中 gateway 进程看看：

terminal

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys

# Try to connect to the running gateway via its control interface
# The gateway listens on a unix socket or localhost port
# Let's check what port/socket it uses

import socket, os

# Check if there's a control socket
socket_path = os.path.expanduser("~/.hermes/gateway.sock")
print(f"Gateway socket path: {socket_path}, exists: {os.path.exists(socket_path)}")

# Also check for any UNIX sockets in /tmp or similar
import glob
sockets = glob.glob("/tmp/*hermes*") + glob.glob("/tmp/*gateway*") + glob.glob("~/.hermes/*.sock")
print(f"Potential sockets: {sockets}")

# Check what ports the gateway process is listening on
import psutil
gateway_pid = 1967372
proc = psutil.Process(gateway_pid)
conns = proc.connections(kind='inet')
print(f"\nGateway inet connections:")
for c in conns:
    if c.status == 'LISTEN':
        print(f"  {c.laddr}")
PYEOF


Output:
Gateway socket path: /root/.hermes/gateway.sock, exists: False
Potential sockets: ['/tmp/hermes-snap-b8690c47c374.sh', '/tmp/hermes-cwd-b8690c47c374.txt']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 19, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'psutil'


<think>
psutil is not installed. Let me try to directly test the live adapter path by creating a WeChat adapter and calling send via `run_coroutine_threadsafe` with the running loop. Actually, I can just call `_deliver_result` directly with the right adapters and loop.

Actually, let me think about this differently. The `runner.adapters` dict is set during gateway initialization. Let me look at what adapters the gateway registers. I can check this by looking at the gateway config.

Actually, let me just try a completely different approach. Let me add a debug statement to the scheduler.py to log `runtime_adapter` and then restart the gateway. But that would require modifying the code.

Wait, maybe the issue is that `runner.adapters` is empty because the gateway was started with certain platform adapters disabled. Or perhaps the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters` since it uses a different delivery mechanism. Let me reconsider the entire flow again.

When the cron daemon ticks, it calls `cron_tick` with `adapters=runner.adapters`. If `runner.adapters` is empty or doesn't include WeChat, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None`, so the live adapter block gets skipped and the standalone path runs instead. But we know the standalone path works, so the problem must be elsewhere. Let me look at what `get_due_jobs()` returns for the 17:30 cron job. The cron daemon is running as a daemon thread, so `get_running_loop()` should return the gateway's event loop without issue.

Actually, I need to understand how the gateway is structured. The `hermes gateway run` command starts the gateway, which runs `asyncio.run(self._run())`, and within `_run()` the cron daemon thread starts. So the main thread's event loop is the gateway's loop, and the cron daemon thread captures a reference to it.

Let me just test this directly by calling `_deliver_result` with `adapters` containing a WeChat adapter and `loop` set to the running loop, so I can see if the live adapter path actually works.
</think>

<think>
psutil is not installed. Let me try to directly test the live adapter path by creating a WeChat adapter and calling send via `run_coroutine_threadsafe` with the running loop. Actually, I can just call `_deliver_result` directly with the right adapters and loop.

Actually, let me think about this differently. The `runner.adapters` dict is set during gateway initialization. Let me look at what adapters the gateway registers. I can check this by looking at the gateway config.

Actually, let me just try a completely different approach. Let me add a debug statement to the scheduler.py to log `runtime_adapter` and then restart the gateway. But that would require modifying the code.

Wait, maybe the issue is that `runner.adapters` is empty because the gateway was started with certain platform adapters disabled. Or perhaps the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters` since it uses a different delivery mechanism. Let me reconsider the entire flow again.

When the cron daemon ticks, it calls `cron_tick` with `adapters=runner.adapters`. If `runner.adapters` is empty or doesn't include WeChat, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None`, so the live adapter block gets skipped and the standalone path runs instead. But we know the standalone path works, so the problem must be elsewhere. Let me look at what `get_due_jobs()` returns for the 17:30 cron job. The cron daemon is running as a daemon thread, so `get_running_loop()` should return the gateway's event loop without issue.

Actually, I need to understand how the gateway is structured. The `hermes gateway run` command starts the gateway, which runs `asyncio.run(self._run())`, and within `_run()` the cron daemon thread starts. So the main thread's event loop is the gateway's loop, and the cron daemon thread captures a reference to it.

Let me just test this directly by calling `_deliver_result` with `adapters` containing a WeChat adapter and `loop` set to the running loop, so I can see if the live adapter path actually works.
</think>

让亮换个思路——直接模拟 cron daemon 的行为，用真实的 adapter 和 running loop 调用 `_deliver_result`：

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 << 'PYEOF'
import asyncio, logging, sys, json

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG, format='%(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s', stream=sys.stdout)
cron_logger = logging.getLogger('cron.scheduler')
cron_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
sm_logger = logging.getLogger('tools.send_message_tool')
sm_logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

# Create the WeChat adapter the way the gateway does
from gateway.config import Platform, load_gateway_config
from gateway.platforms.weixin import WeixinAdapter

config = load_gateway_config()
pconfig = config.platforms.get(Platform.WEIXIN)

adapter = WeixinAdapter(pconfig)
print(f"Created WeChat adapter, _session: {adapter._session}")

# Create a mock adapters dict like runner.adapters
adapters = {"weixin": adapter}  # Note: key is "weixin" string, not Platform enum

# Get the running loop
loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
print(f"Loop: {loop}, is_running: {loop.is_running()}")

# Now test _deliver_result with live adapters
from cron.scheduler import _deliver_result

with open('/root/.hermes/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
job = next(j for j in data['jobs'] if j['id'] == '5063251e7794')

content = """【📮 喷嚏图卦】2026-04-24

1. 今年1-3月彩票销量下滑46亿，平均每人买了100块 😂 大家都去填梦想了

2. DeepSeek V4发布，百万上下文直接标配！AI进入"免费大杯"时代 ☕

3. 北京一季度电动自行车事故已死亡44人 🚲 速度与激情，现实版

4. 华谊兄弟被申请破产，曾经900亿市值只剩54亿 📉 娱乐圈寒气逼人

5. 特朗普：干嘛用核武器？常规手段就能彻底摧毁伊朗 😏

#喷嚏图卦"""

print("\n=== Testing with live adapter ===")
result = _deliver_result(job, content, adapters=adapters, loop=loop)
print(f"Result: {result}")
PYEOF


Output:
Created WeChat adapter, _session: None
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 23, in <module>
RuntimeError: no running event loop


<think>
OK, there's no running event loop in this Python process. That's expected. The gateway has the running loop. Let me think about this differently.

Actually, let me just check: is the `adapters` dict keyed by platform string names or `Platform` enum values? In `gateway/run.py`, when `runner.adapters` is built, it might be keyed by string names or by enum.

Let me check how `runner.adapters` is built by looking at the gateway code.
</think>

<think>
OK, there's no running event loop in this Python process. That's expected. The gateway has the running loop. Let me think about this differently.

Actually, let me just check: is the `adapters` dict keyed by platform string names or `Platform` enum values? In `gateway/run.py`, when `runner.adapters` is built, it might be keyed by string names or by enum.

Let me check how `runner.adapters` is built by looking at the gateway code.
</think>

需要看 `runner.adapters` 的 key 是字符串还是枚举。检查 gateway 的 adapters 注册：


<think>
Let me search more broadly for `adapters` in run.py.
</think>

<think>
Let me search more broadly for `adapters` in run.py.
</think>

<think>
Let me search more broadly for `adapters` in run.py.
</think>

<think>
Let me search more broadly for `adapters` in run.py.
</think>


self.adapters: Dict[Platform, BasePlatformAdapter] = {}

existing = self.adapters.get(adapter.platform)

self.adapters.pop(adapter.platform, None)

self.delivery_router.adapters = self.adapters

if not self.adapters and not self._failed_platforms:

elif not self.adapters and self._failed_platforms:

adapter = self.adapters.get(event.source.platform)

self.adapters[platform] = adapter

"platforms": [p.value for p in self.adapters.keys()],

directory = build_channel_directory(self.adapters)

self.adapters[platform] = adapter

for platform, adapter in list(self.adapters.items()):

self.adapters.clear()

_stt_adapter = self.adapters.get(source.platform)

adapter = self.adapters.get(Platform.DISCORD)

_typing_adapter = self.adapters.get(source.platform)

_media_adapter = self.adapters.get(source.platform)

_err_adapter = self.adapters.get(source.platform)

connected_platforms = [p.value for p in self.adapters.keys()]

adapter = self.adapters.get(platform)

adapter = self.adapters.get(platform)

adapter = self.adapters.get(platform)

for p, a in self.adapters.items():

for p, a in self.adapters.items():


<think>
Found it! Line 536: `self.adapters: Dict[Platform, BasePlatformAdapter] = {}`. The `adapters` dict is keyed by `Platform` enum, NOT string. So `runner.adapters` has keys like `Platform.WEIXIN` (the enum), not `"weixin"` (the string).

Now in `_deliver_result`, line 304: `runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)`. Here `platform` is `Platform.WEIXIN` (from the `platform_map`). So `runtime_adapter = adapters.get(Platform.WEIXIN)` - this SHOULD work if WeChat is in the gateway's adapters.

But what if the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`? Then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd take the standalone path instead, which we know works. So maybe the WeChat adapter just isn't being loaded into the gateway's adapters at all.

Looking at line 1593, adapters get registered via `self.adapters[platform] = adapter`, but I need to trace where the WeChat adapter actually gets initialized to understand why it might not be making it into that dictionary.
</think>

找到了！Line 536: `self.adapters: Dict[Platform, BasePlatformAdapter] = {}`。key 是 `Platform` 枚举，不是字符串。所以 `runtime_adapter = adapters.get(Platform.WEIXIN)` 应该可以找到。

但如果 WeChat adapter 根本没被注册到 `runner.adapters` 呢？让亮直接重启 gateway 并检查：

# Check if WeChat is in the running gateway's adapters
# by looking at what the gateway has registered
# We can do this by checking the gateway's internal state via a Python probe

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 -c "
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '/root/.hermes/hermes-agent')

# Try to connect to the gateway via its internal APIs
# to see what adapters are registered
from gateway.config import load_gateway_config, Platform
config = load_gateway_config()
print('Configured platforms:')
for p, pc in config.platforms.items():
    if pc.enabled:
        print(f'  {p.value}: enabled, home_channel={pc.home_channel}')
"


Output:
Configured platforms:
  weixin: enabled, home_channel=HomeChannel(platform=<Platform.WEIXIN: 'weixin'>, chat_id='o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat', name='Home')


<think>
OK so only WeChat is configured as enabled. Now let me think about this problem differently.

The issue might be simpler than I thought. Let me look at the actual flow again:

1. Cron daemon calls `cron_tick(verbose=False, adapters=runner.adapters, loop=asyncio.get_running_loop())`
2. `tick()` calls `get_due_jobs()` which returns job 1 (since it's 17:30)
3. Job 1 is executed (via `run_job()`) which saves output to file
4. `_deliver_result()` is called with `adapters` and `loop`

5. In `_deliver_result()`, the runtime adapter for WeChat gets retrieved from the adapters dict using the platform enum, and if the loop is running, it attempts to send via the live adapter path using `run_coroutine_threadsafe()` with a 60-second timeout.

When the WeChat adapter's `send()` returns a failure result, the code logs a warning and sets `adapter_ok = False`, which should trigger the fallback to standalone delivery. However, the warning logs are being suppressed because the logger level is set to WARNING, so I can't see these messages in the output even though the fallback should be executing.

Since the standalone path works when tested directly with `_deliver_result(job, content, adapters=None, loop=None)`, the issue must be that the live adapter path is somehow succeeding and returning before the fallback can trigger. Let me reconsider whether the WeChat adapter's `send()` method might actually be returning success in the cron daemon's context, or if there's an exception being caught that's preventing the proper error handling.

Looking at the job's `last_status` of "ok" and `last_delivery_error` of null suggests the delivery function returned None, but the user still didn't receive the message. The problem might be that the WeChat adapter isn't even registered in the gateway's adapters during initialization—maybe the gateway loads WeChat lazily or skips it entirely if the session is null. Let me check how the gateway decides which adapters to register in the first place.

Actually, the WeChat adapter might not be registered because the gateway hasn't accepted any messages from WeChat users yet, or it only registers adapters for platforms that have received at least one message. If that's the case, then `runner.adapters.get(Platform.WEIXIN)` would return None, and the standalone path would handle delivery instead.

But here's the real issue: if the standalone path is working correctly in isolation, why isn't it working in the actual cron daemon? The cron daemon passes its own event loop and adapters dict to the delivery function, so there might be something about how it's invoking the standalone path that's different from my direct test.

I'm realizing the problem could be that `platform` is being passed as a string "weixin" instead of the enum `Platform.WEIXIN`, which would cause the fallback logic to fail silently. But looking at the platform_map, it's clearly being resolved to the enum correctly when the job is processed.

Let me reconsider: maybe the standalone path actually is executing successfully (returning None), which is why `last_delivery_error` is null, but the message is still reaching WeChat through the live adapter path instead. I should verify whether the live adapter is actually succeeding despite the "Not connected" error, or if something else is preventing the message from being delivered.

Actually, I just realized that when I tested standalone directly with `adapters=None, loop=None`, it went straight to standalone and worked. But in the cron daemon context, `adapters=runner.adapters` which is not None, so the live adapter path is tried first. The real question is whether `runtime_adapter` is actually None or if it's the WeChat adapter itself. If the WeChat adapter isn't registered in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be None and the standalone path would execute instead.

Wait, but if the WeChat adapter isn't registered, then `runtime_adapter` being None means we skip the live adapter block entirely and go straight to standalone. The issue might be that the standalone path is actually working fine, but the user isn't receiving messages through that path. Or perhaps the gateway's WeChat adapter is registered but something else is preventing the delivery from succeeding. Let me reconsider the `_send_weixin` function to see if there's an issue with how it handles the WeChat send operation.

The function checks requirements and then calls `send_weixin_direct` with the config. If an exception occurs, it returns an error. But my direct test showed it works fine, so the problem must be in how `_deliver_result` is invoking this. I think I need to actually run the cron job and observe the real logs to see what's happening in the actual execution flow.

Actually, looking back at my test output - I sent a message to WeChat using standalone delivery and the user received it. So standalone works. The real question is why the cron daemon's delivery isn't working. Let me just run the cron job again and check if the message actually gets delivered this time.
</think>

问题的根源已经很清晰了——WeChat 在 `runner.adapters` 中可能根本没有被注册（因为它用的是 iLink 协议，gateway 可能没有主动建立 WebSocket 连接）。

让亮直接在 gateway 进程中添加诊断日志，然后重启：


   304|    runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
   305|    if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():
   306|        send_metadata = {"thread_id": thread_id} if thread_id else None
   307|        try:
   308|            # Send cleaned text (MEDIA tags stripped) — not the raw content
   309|            text_to_send = cleaned_delivery_content.strip()
   310|            adapter_ok = True
   311|            if text_to_send:
   312|

Use offset=312 to continue reading (showing 304-311 of 990 lines)


<think>
OK, let me just add a debug log at line 304 to log what `runtime_adapter` is. But first, let me think about the simplest possible fix.

Actually, you know what? Let me just check if the WeChat adapter is registered by looking at the gateway startup logs. But more importantly, let me just fix the issue.

The problem is:
1. If WeChat IS in `runner.adapters`: live adapter path tried → `send()` returns `success=False` → fallback to standalone → should work
2. If WeChat is NOT in `runner.adapters`: `runtime_adapter = None` → skip live adapter path → standalone → should work

Either way standalone should work, but the user says they didn't receive the message. The output file shows the job ran multiple times, yet `last_delivery_error` is null. So either standalone is silently failing or the error is being swallowed somewhere. I'm wondering if there's an exception in the standalone path that's not being caught properly.

Looking at the code, if `pconfig` is None when calling `_send_to_platform`, it would raise an `AttributeError` trying to access `.enabled` on None, which should be caught by the exception handler and returned as an error string. But maybe the exception is happening elsewhere and not being caught the way I think.

Actually, wait—if `pconfig` were None, that would mean `config.platforms.get(Platform.WEIXIN)` returned None, which shouldn't happen since the WeChat platform is definitely configured. So that's probably not it.

Let me step back and think about this differently. The cron job ran four times today but the user received no messages, which means either the standalone path is failing silently without raising an exception, or something else is preventing the messages from being sent. Maybe I should add a debug log to see what's actually happening in the standalone path instead of continuing to guess.

Actually, you know what—I've been going in circles on this. Let me just add some diagnostic logging to see what's actually happening when the gateway runs, and then restart it so I can observe the real behavior.

But wait, before I do that, let me check if the real problem is simpler—maybe the standalone path IS working and delivering to WeChat, but the user isn't seeing the messages because they're sending from a different WeChat account than the one registered to the bot. Let me look back at what the user actually told me.

Actually, the user confirmed they're using the personal WeChat account `o9cq801Q4BDVa20m46H0KTKRUOjo@im.wechat` that we tested earlier, so that's not it. Let me just add a debug log to `_deliver_result` that logs `runtime_adapter` and the result, then restart the gateway to see what's actually happening.
</think>

让亮直接在 `_deliver_result` 中加入一行调试日志，看看 `runtime_adapter` 到底是 `None` 还是有值，然后重启 gateway：

patch

    runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
    if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():

    runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
    logger.debug(
        "Job '%s': delivery probe — platform=%s, runtime_adapter=%s, loop=%s, is_running=%s",
        job["id"], platform, runtime_adapter, loop,
        loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)() if loop else False,
    )
    if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():


--- a//root/.hermes/hermes-agent/cron/scheduler.py
+++ b//root/.hermes/hermes-agent/cron/scheduler.py
@@ -302,6 +302,11 @@
     # Prefer the live adapter when the gateway is running — this supports E2EE
     # rooms (e.g. Matrix) where the standalone HTTP path cannot encrypt.
     runtime_adapter = (adapters or {}).get(platform)
+    logger.debug(
+        "Job '%s': delivery probe — platform=%s, runtime_adapter=%s, loop=%s, is_running=%s",
+        job["id"], platform, runtime_adapter, loop,
+        loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)() if loop else False,
+    )
     if runtime_adapter is not None and loop is not None and getattr(loop, "is_running", lambda: False)():
         send_metadata = {"thread_id": thread_id} if thread_id else None
         try:


<think>
Good, now I also need to set the cron.scheduler logger to DEBUG level. Let me check the current logger configuration. The logger level is set to WARNING in the config. Let me set it to DEBUG by updating the gateway's logging config or by patching the code.

Actually, I can set it programmatically in the scheduler.py file itself. Let me add a line at the top of the file to set the logger level to DEBUG. But that might be too invasive.

Actually, the simplest approach is to update the gateway's logging config. But I don't know where that is.

Let me just check the cron daemon's logger configuration. Looking at the gateway's startup, it probably sets the root logger level. Let me search for where the cron.scheduler logger level is configured.

Wait, I'm overcomplicating this. The real issue is that when I tested standalone delivery with `adapters=None, loop=None`, the message actually went through to WeChat, but the user isn't seeing it. Let me trace through the actual cron daemon flow—the gateway process starts with `asyncio.run(self._run())` which creates a new event loop and runs until completion, then the cron daemon thread starts in that context.

The daemon thread captures `asyncio.get_running_loop()` which should be valid, and it passes both the runner's adapters and that loop reference to `_start_cron_ticker`. So the loop should definitely be accessible when the ticker fires. Maybe the problem isn't the loop at all—perhaps the gateway's WeChat adapter simply isn't registered in `runner.adapters` for some reason, which would explain why the user isn't receiving messages even though the standalone path worked when I tested it.

Actually, I should step back and think about the most straightforward explanation: maybe the cron daemon isn't running at all, or it fired but the delivery failed for a different reason than I'm assuming. Rather than continuing to trace through all these possibilities, I should just run the cron job manually right now to see what actually happens.

Let me restart the gateway with the debug logging I added and observe the logs in real time to understand what's really going on.
</think>

好，日志加上了。现在重启 gateway 让调试生效：

terminal

cd /root/.hermes && HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes python3 -c "
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '/root/.hermes/hermes-agent')

# Find PID of gateway process
import os
pid_file = '/root/.hermes/gateway.pid'
if os.path.exists(pid_file):
    with open(pid_file) as f:
        pid = int(f.read().strip())
    print(f'Gateway PID from file: {pid}')
    try:
        os.kill(pid, 0)  # check if alive
        print(f'Process {pid} is alive')
    except ProcessLookupError:
        print(f'Process {pid} not found')
else:
    print('No PID file found')

# Find by process name
import subprocess
result = subprocess.run(['pgrep', '-f', 'hermes_cli.main gateway'], capture_output=True, text=True)
print(f'Gateway PIDs: {result.stdout.strip()}')
"


Output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in <module>
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '{"pid": 1967372, "kind": "hermes-gateway", "argv": ["/root/.hermes/hermes-agent/hermes_cli/main.py", "gateway", "run", "--replace"], "start_time": 390998880}'


<think>
The PID file is JSON, not just a number. Let me find the PID properly.
</think>

PID 文件是 JSON 格式。让亮找到 gateway PID 并重启：

HERMES_HOME=/root/.hermes && python3 -c "
import json
with open('/root/.hermes/gateway.pid') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
print(f'PID: {data[\"pid\"]}')
print(f'Kind: {data[\"kind\"]}')
print(f'Start time: {data[\"start_time\"]}')
import os
import time
age = time.time() - data['start_time']
print(f'Age: {age:.0f}s ({age/3600:.1f}h)')
"


Output:
PID: 1967372
Kind: hermes-gateway
Start time: 390998880
Age: 1386027551s (385007.7h)


<think>
That age calculation is clearly wrong - 385007 hours is insane. The start_time field is probably not a Unix timestamp. Let me just use pgrep to find the gateway PID and kill/restart it.Actually, let me use pgrep to find the gateway process and then send SIGTERM to restart it.Actually, the easiest way to restart the gateway is to use the hermes CLI itself. Let me try:```
hermes gateway stop
hermes gateway run --replace &
```But first, let me check if there's a `stop` command.Actually, since the gateway was started with `--replace`, maybe I can just start a new one and it will replace the old one.

I need to verify the PID 1967372 is still actually running before I try to restart it.
</think>

让亮重启 gateway：

kill -USR1 1967372 2>/dev/null; echo "Sent SIGUSR1"; sleep 2; pgrep -f "hermes_cli.main gateway" && echo "Gateway still running" || echo "Gateway stopped"


Output:
Sent SIGUSR1
1967372
3216966
Gateway still running


<think>
Hmm, there are two PIDs now (1967372 and 3216966). The `--replace` flag probably started a new instance (3216966) and the old one (1967372) is still running too. Or SIGUSR1 didn't do anything useful.

Let me try a different approach. The gateway probably handles SIGUSR1 as a reload signal, not a restart. Let me just kill the old one and let the new one take over.Actually, with `--replace`, the new gateway should replace the old one. Let me check which one is the "main" one.

Actually, the simplest approach: let me just kill the old gateway process and start a fresh one.

I'm second-guessing whether `hermes gateway run` with `--replace` actually daemonizes or if it runs in the foreground—I should verify the actual process list to understand what's happening with these two PIDs.
</think>

有两个 gateway 进程？让亮重启（先停旧进程）：

kill 1967372 3216966 2>/dev/null; sleep 3; pgrep -f "hermes_cli.main gateway" && echo "still running" || echo "stopped"


Output:
1967372
3217028
still running


<think>
The gateway keeps respawning. With `--replace` flag, when one instance dies, a new one starts automatically. Let me just let the current instance keep running and instead focus on fixing the actual bug.

Actually, wait. The gateway is running with `--replace` which means if I kill it, it just respawns. That's fine.

Let me take a completely different approach to diagnose this. Instead of trying to figure out why the cron daemon's delivery is failing, let me just look at what the cron daemon is actually doing by checking its logs.

The gateway's cron daemon logs go to the gateway's stdout/stderr. Since the gateway was started in a certain way, let me find its output log.

Wait, I just realized something. I tested the standalone path with `adapters=None, loop=None` and it worked fine. But in the cron daemon, `adapters` and `loop` are both passed in. What if the gateway's `adapters` dict is actually empty or missing the WeChat adapter entirely? That would explain why the daemon isn't delivering. I need to find a way to inspect what `runner.adapters` actually contains.

Let me think about this differently. If the WeChat adapter isn't in `runner.adapters`, then `runtime_adapter` would be `None` and we'd skip the live adapter block entirely. That means we'd hit the standalone path with `_send_to_platform`, which I verified works. So either the WeChat adapter is in `runner.adapters` and the live path is being tried, or something else is preventing the delivery from working in the daemon context.

Actually, I'm wondering if there's a timing issue with how `adapters` gets populated. The cron daemon thread is spawned before `runner.adapters` is fully initialized, so maybe it's capturing a reference to an empty dict that hasn't been populated yet with the WeChat adapter. I'm probably overthinking this—let me just test the live adapter path directly with the running loop and see what actually happens.

Wait, I can't use `get_running_loop()` here since we're not inside an async context. I could try calling the gateway's internal API through its control file or API endpoint instead.
</think>

gateway 在 `--replace` 模式下会自动守护重启。让亮换个思路——直接问 gateway 的管理接口看它注册了哪些 adapters：

# Try to connect to the gateway's control socket or API
ls -la /root/.hermes/ | grep -E "sock|api|control"
# Check if there's a management port or unix socket
find /root/.hermes -name "*.sock" -o -name "*.api" 2>/dev/null


<think>
No control socket found. Let me try a completely different approach. Let me just look at what the cron daemon would actually do by tracing through the code.

Actually, you know what, let me just focus on the simplest explanation. The debug log I added will tell us what `runtime_adapter` is when the cron daemon fires next. Let me wait for the next cron tick (which happens every 60 seconds) and then check the gateway's logs.

But the gateway's logs are probably going to stdout/stderr which I can't easily access. Unless... the gateway logs to a file?

Actually, let me just check the cron output directory again. Maybe the job is running but the delivery is failing in a way that's not being recorded.Wait, actually - I just thought of something. When I tested with `adapters=None, loop=None`, the standalone path ran and succeeded.

So standalone definitely works. In the cron daemon context, if `runtime_adapter` is `None`, the standalone path runs and should succeed too. But if `runtime_adapter` is the WeChat adapter, then the live adapter path gets tried first—and that's where things might be failing.

When the live adapter returns `success=False`, the code falls back to standalone, which should also work. Unless the exception handling is catching something unexpected. Let me trace through what happens after the exception block to see where the flow actually continues.

After the exception is caught and logged, execution falls through to the standalone path at line 339. But I should double-check whether the exception actually interrupts the control flow or if something else is happening there.

Actually, I'm overcomplicating this. Let me just look at what the `_send_to_platform` function returns when it succeeds versus when it fails, and trace through the logic again to confirm the fallback mechanism is working as intended. The standalone path should work correctly when invoked by the cron daemon. But I should verify whether the loop's `is_running()` method might be returning something unexpected, so let me add some debug output to check that directly. Actually, I think the real issue is that the gateway might not be registering the WeChat adapter in `runner.adapters` at all, which would explain why the fallback keeps triggering. Let me examine how the WeChat adapter gets initialized in the gateway code.
</think>

让亮换个角度——查看 gateway 源码中 WeChat adapter 的注册时机：


<think>
No direct WeixinAdapter instantiation in run.py. Let me search more broadly for how adapters are registered.
</think>

<think>
No direct WeixinAdapter instantiation in run.py. Let me search more broadly for how adapters are registered.
</think>

<think>
No direct WeixinAdapter instantiation in run.py. Let me search more broadly for how adapters are registered.
</think>


<think>
Let me look at lines around 1593 where adapters are registered.
</think>

<think>
Let me look at lines around 1593 where adapters are registered.
</think>

<think>
Let me look at lines around 1593 where adapters are registered.
</think>

<think>
Let me look at lines around 1593 where adapters are registered.
</think>


  1575|
  1576|            # Set up message + fatal error handlers
  1577|            adapter.set_message_handler(self._handle_message)
  1578|            adapter.set_fatal_error_handler(self._handle_adapter_fatal_error)
  1579|            adapter.set_session_store(self.session_store)
  1580|            adapter.set_busy_session_handler(self._handle_active_session_busy_message)
  1581|
  1582|            # Try to connect
  1583|            logger.info("Connecting to %s...", platform.value)
  1584|            self._update_platform_runtime_status(
  1585|                platform.value,
  1586|                platform_state="connecting",
  1587|                error_code=None,
  1588|                error_message=None,
  1589|            )
  1590|            try:
  1591|                success = await adapter.connect()
  1592|                if success:
  1593|                    self.adapters[platform] = adapter
  1594|                    self._sync_voice_mode_state_to_adapter(adapter)
  1595|                    connected_count += 1
  1596|                    self._update_platform_runtime_status(
  1597|                        platform.value,
  1598|                        platform_state="connected",
  1599|                        error_code=None,
  1600|                        error_message=None,
  1601|                    )
  1602|                    logger.info("✓ %s connected", platform.value)
  1603|                else:
  1604|                    logger.warning("✗ %s failed to connect", platform.value)
  1605|                    if adapter.has_fatal_error:
  1606|                        self._update_platform_runtime_status(
  1607|                            platform.value,
  1608|                            platform_state="retrying" if adapter.fatal_error_retryable else "fatal",
  1609|                            error_code=adapter.fatal_error_code,
  1610|                            error_message=adapter.fatal_error_message,
  1611|                        )
  1612|                        target = (
  1613|                            startup_retryable_errors
  1614|                            if adapter.fatal_error_retryable
  1615|                            else startup_nonretryable_errors
  1616|                        )
  1617|                        target.append(
  1618|                            f"{platform.value}: {adapter.fatal_error_message}"
  1619|                        )
  1620|                        # Queue for reconnection if the error is retryable
  1621|                        if adapter.fatal_error_retryable:
  1622|                            self._failed_platforms[platform] = {
  1623|                                "config": platform_config,
  1624|                                "attempts": 1,
  1625|                                "next_retry": time.monotonic() + 30,
  1626|                            }
  1627|                    else:
  1628|                        self._update_platform_runtime_status(
  1629|                            platform.value,
  1630|                            platform_state="retrying",
  1631|                            error_code=None,
  1632|                            error_message="failed to connect",
  1633|                        )
  1634|                        startup_retryable_errors.append(
  1635|

Use offset=1635 to continue reading (showing 1575-1634 of 9003 lines)